Table of contents
User-Friendly Setup
Autocrypt aims to make encryption easier for the average user by simplifying the key exchange process. This reduces the technical barriers associated with traditional methods of email encryption.
Seamless Integration
It is designed to integrate seamlessly with existing email clients, requiring minimal user intervention once configured.
Support for Opportunistic Encryption
Autocrypt encourages opportunistic encryption, meaning that it automatically encrypts emails if both parties support Autocrypt, enhancing privacy without complex setups.
Asynchronous Communication
Autocrypt supports asynchronous communication by allowing users to receive encrypted emails even when not online, as key exchange is done via email headers.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Autocrypt is good.
Check the traffic stats of Autocrypt on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Autocrypt on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Autocrypt's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Autocrypt on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Autocrypt on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Also, isn't downloading and using DeltaChat would be easier? It used autocrypt protocol out of the box as well bunch of useful features and feels more like comfortable messenger than email. Source: about 3 years ago
You should look into the autocrypt standard and apps that can use it. Https://autocrypt.org/ Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocrypt. Source: over 3 years ago
They can also use new headers then parse those, that is what Autocrypt does, See https://autocrypt.org/ . The email specification allows custom headers for extension. Source: over 3 years ago
Requirement 1: It should be backwards compatible with existing email systems. As examples, consider Delta Chat and the Autocrypt specification it's built on. https://delta.chat/en/ https://autocrypt.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
That's why I said https://delta.chat/en/ ;) An email-based messenger with https://autocrypt.org/. Source: over 4 years ago
Usability: Traditional e-mail clients that added support for e2ee did just about enough work to be able to claim it was functional. but we know, decades later, that software needs to be extremely simple and well-designed for large numbers of users to adopt it. So when users were faced with weird, confusing, or buggy tooling, they typically turned it off. How do we fix this? A lot more active research needs to... Source: almost 5 years ago
As PGP is still utilized Autocrypt is the implementation that makes sense for Tutanota (#198). Source: almost 5 years ago
If you want encrypted instant messaging, I'd recommend the Matrix ecosystem, using the Element apps.[0] For an email-based protocol, I would suggest Delta Chat[1], which is backwards compatible with existing email accounts, and follows the Autocrypt approach to PGP[2]. [0] https://element.io/ [1] https://delta.chat/en/ [2] https://autocrypt.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
> you have to use it in your existing email client, and then you have to download keys, and then thereโs this whole third issue of making sure theyโre the right keys. If you use Thunderbird as your email client, then it will download the right keys for you automatically.[0] Actually it's two clicks to use the WKD support to download the key (assuming your correspondent's email provider supports that, as ProtonMail... - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
> a new protocol that can degrade gracefully Does Autocrypt meet that definition? https://autocrypt.org/ Sadly, for the last 3 years, ProtonMail has resisted implementing it (unlike Posteo, for example), using FUD tactics to justify themselves: https://github.com/ProtonMail/WebClient/issues/120. - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago
If we're sharing obligatory links, then a detailed critique of "The PGP Problem" is: https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=pgpfan:tpp It's true, though, that much work is needed to bring PGP up to the levels expected of modern crypto tools. Hopefully some of that will happen as a result of the work happening in the IETF: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-03.html and due to technology... - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago
I think Autocrypt is meant to help address this issue, but not 100% sure. Someone, please correct me if this is wrong. Source: over 5 years ago
It sounds like what you want should be doable, although I suspect it takes multiple parts working together. As for the sending messages part, one option is autocrypt, which I learned about from Mailpile (linked elsewhere in other comments). There are arguably more secure options, but autocrypt does make it easy to send encrypted emails (and switch to encryption when someone else starts encrypting their emails. Source: over 5 years ago
Autocrypt is a notable advancement in the realm of email encryption, focusing on user-friendliness and broad integration with existing email systems. Initially developed to simplify the often complex world of PGP encryption, Autocrypt has garnered diverse public opinions, largely highlighting its ease of adoption and compatibility with existing technologies. Below is a concise analysis of the general sentiment and main points of discussion surrounding Autocrypt based on recent community insights and product mentions.
Autocrypt distinguishes itself by emphasizing simplicity and user accessibility, which are critical concerns in the adoption of end-to-end encryption among the broader public. Traditional encryption solutions have often been complex and intimidating, which has deterred widespread use outside tech-savvy circles. Community discussions reflect an appreciation for Autocryptโs potential to change this narrative by reducing complexity, making secure email communications more approachable for the average user.
Autocrypt's design allows it to work seamlessly with existing email frameworks, addressing a significant pain point in the gradual modernization of digital communications. This backward compatibility, particularly as seen with DeltaChat integration, is frequently highlighted in user forums as a necessary criterion for any new secure communication protocol. Autocryptโs use of custom email headers is specifically commended for its ease of integration and use without the need for substantial software overhauls.
While Autocrypt makes strides in usability and integration, it operates in a competitive landscape with significant alternatives like GPG Suite, GnuPG, and others. Despite fierce competition from entrenched encryption protocols, Autocrypt gains attention for its innovative approach to simplifying key exchange and setup processes. Delta Chat is often citied alongside Autocrypt, illustrating its role in user discourse as a practical application of the Autocrypt standards.
However, the adoption of Autocrypt is not without its criticisms. Some users express skepticism regarding its security efficacy compared to more rigorous protocols. There's a consensus that while Autocrypt simplifies many existing challenges in email encryption, it may not yet match the security robustness demanded by high-stakes or governmental use cases. These concerns point towards a compromise between usability and maximum securityโan area often debated among cybersecurity professionals.
Autocrypt's relevancy extends beyond traditional email systems, earning mentions in discussions about potential replacements for conventional email protocols. By aligning with modern needsโsuch as pairing with messengers or streamlined cryptography practicesโAutocrypt is framed as a forward-thinking initiative aiding in the transition to more secure communication methods. However, debates remain about its adoption among major email service providers, with some, like ProtonMail, having yet to fully embrace the approach.
In summary, public opinion on Autocrypt is largely positive regarding its ease of use and thoughtful integration with existing communication technologies, presenting it as a viable contender in the realm of accessible digital privacy solutions. However, ongoing discussions underscore the need for continual refinement and broader implementation to fully realize its potential in the landscape of secure communications.
Do you know an article comparing Autocrypt to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Autocrypt good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Autocrypt here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
