Autocomplete VS aText

Compare Autocomplete VS aText and see what are their differences

NinjaOne

NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Autocomplete

Suggests and completes words as you type! Write faster and more efficiently.

aText

aText accelerates your typing by replacing abbreviations with frequently used phrases you define.

Landing page //
2023-10-15

Landing page //
2023-08-03

Autocomplete

Website: github.com
Platforms: -

Edit details

aText

Website: trankynam.com
Platforms: Mac OSX Windows

Edit details

Autocomplete features and specs

Ease of Use
Autocomplete is simple to integrate into a project and requires minimal setup, making it accessible for developers of varying experience levels.
Lightweight
The library is small, which means it won’t significantly increase the load time of applications, benefiting performance-sensitive environments.
Customizability
Autocomplete provides options for customization, allowing developers to tailor its behavior and appearance to better fit their application's design and functionality needs.

Possible disadvantages of Autocomplete

Limited Features
Compared to more comprehensive solutions, Autocomplete may lack advanced features such as AI-based suggestions or server-side integration, making it less suitable for complex needs.
Community Support
As an open-source project, it may not have the extensive community support or frequent updates seen in more widely used libraries, which could impact long-term viability.
Dependency Management
As with any third-party library, there might be concerns regarding dependencies, versioning, and compatibility with other parts of the project, requiring careful management.

aText features and specs

Efficiency
aText allows users to streamline repetitive typing tasks by creating custom shortcuts and text expansions, thus increasing productivity.
Customizability
The application lets users set up personalized abbreviations for phrases, addresses, and other frequently used text, making it highly adaptable to individual needs.
Cross-app Compatibility
aText works across various applications, ensuring that text expansion features are accessible in email clients, browsers, and other software.
Cost-effective
aText is relatively affordable compared to other text expansion software, providing a robust feature set at a lower price point.
User-friendly Interface
The software boasts an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all experience levels.

Possible disadvantages of aText

Platform Limitation
As of now, aText is only available for macOS, which excludes users who are on Windows or other operating systems.
Learning Curve
Although the interface is user-friendly, new users might still face a modest learning curve when setting up and optimizing their shortcuts.
Limited Advanced Features
aText may lack some advanced features found in competitive text expansion tools, such as built-in scripting and advanced form-filling capabilities.
No Mobile Version
There is no mobile application for aText, which limits its use to desktop and laptop environments, excluding smartphones and tablets.

Analysis of aText

Overall verdict

Yes, aText is considered good for its intended purpose.

Why this product is good

aText is known for being a reliable text expansion application that helps increase typing efficiency by allowing users to create shortcuts for commonly used phrases, code snippets, or other text. It is lightweight, easy to use, and offers features like snippet organization, cloud synchronization, and compatibility with various applications, which contribute to its positive reputation.

Recommended for

aText is recommended for individuals who frequently type repetitive text, such as professional writers, developers, customer support representatives, and anyone looking to enhance typing productivity and efficiency.

Autocomplete videos

+ Add

System design : Design Autocomplete or Typeahead Suggestions for Google search

aText videos

+ Add

aText a $4.99 alternative to TextExpander, demo / tutorial

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Autocomplete and aText)

Autocomplete

aText

Writing Tools

20 20%

Writing Tools

80% 80

Grammar Checker

100 100%

Grammar Checker

0% 0

Automation

0 0%

Automation

100% 100

Proofreading

100 100%

Proofreading

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Autocomplete and aText. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Autocomplete and aText

Autocomplete Reviews

We have no reviews of Autocomplete yet.
Be the first one to post

aText Reviews

StanBright

· Founder at SaaSHub · over 5 years ago
Indispensable productivity tool
I've been using aText for quite some time, and it's been amazing. If you are typing a lot, I'm sure you would be able to optimize your work tremendously. You can have abbreviations for your closing email phrases, URLs, and whatever can come to your mind.

Also, I'd suggest to think of a trigger character and use it at the beginning of all abbreviations. That way you will avoid collisions. I'm using a comma. For example, these are some of my abbreviations:

,br => "Best regards, Stan"

,sh-u => "https://www.saashub.com" (SaaSHub URL)

You get the idea. Once you get used to the app, it will save you a lot of time and typing.

Best Text Expander apps for MacOS

aText is marketed as a text accelerator by its makers. The aText lacks the TextExpanders interface but it does make it up when it comes to other aspects. With aText you can preset a slew of texts and other stuff that you can use as and when you want. Setting it up is effortless and thanks to the labelled fields you can easily manage your workflow. One can also setup aText to...

Source: techwiser.com

What's a good alternative to Textexpander for Mac?

10aTextView ProductMichelle NickolaisenOwner, Bombchelle Industries · Written 4y agoI use aText and I've had 1-2 very minor issues with it over the years, but nothing major. It's definitely worth the $5 fee if you just want something that does text shortcuts & don't necessarily want or need TextExpander's other features.🙏 helpful 4Comments (1)ShareAllan CaegFounder,...

Source: www.producthunt.com

Alternative products to aText

Alfred 3The Mac's best launcher just got a whole lot betterMacProductivityMac Menu Bar Apps+ 12,316get itRecommendationsJeff DavisWhen I sit in front of a Mac that doesn't have Alfred installed, I have no idea what to do. It is like when I am at a friend's house and I drop food on the floor and realize they don't have a dog. Why not just get a dog? It makes like so much...

Source: www.producthunt.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, aText seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Autocomplete mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Autocomplete yet. Tracking of Autocomplete recommendations started around Mar 2021.

aText mentions (2)

Add suites (playing cards)
I think I have a solution for you. I use an app called aText (there are many similar, but this one's my favorite) on my Mac and my PC to make my own shortcuts for phrases and symbols, like this. Source: almost 2 years ago
How to change the date format?
Not quite the answer you're looking for, but I use aText, so I can make my own date format, and my own shortcut, and it can be universal — and I can make all kinds of shortcuts for all kinds of other things, like symbols, emojis, and phrases. This way, I never have to worry about apps that don't have a YYYY-MM-DD option. :). Source: almost 2 years ago