Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

autoComplete.js VS UI Garage

Compare autoComplete.js VS UI Garage and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.

UI Garage logo UI Garage

Specific mobile and web design patterns for your inspiration
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12
  • UI Garage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-10

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

UI Garage features and specs

  • Design Inspiration
    UI Garage provides a wide range of design inspirations from various apps and websites, helping designers to get fresh ideas and enhance their creative process.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform has a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and find specific types of design patterns quickly.
  • Categorized Content
    Content is well-categorized into different UI components like buttons, menus, and forms, allowing users to easily locate the design elements they need.
  • Regular Updates
    New design examples are added regularly, ensuring that users have access to the latest design trends and patterns.

Possible disadvantages of UI Garage

  • Limited Detailed Information
    The site often focuses more on visuals and less on detailed descriptions or development insights, which might be a drawback for those looking for in-depth understanding.
  • Attribution Issues
    Some designs featured on UI Garage may not have proper attribution or detailed information about the original source, potentially causing IP issues.
  • No User Interaction
    UI Garage does not have an interactive community feature like forums or comment sections, which limits user engagement and feedback.
  • Free vs Pro
    Some content or features may be restricted to pro users, requiring a paid subscription for full access, which can be a limitation for those on a tight budget.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to autoComplete.js and UI Garage)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Custom Search Engine
100 100%
0% 0
Web App
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using autoComplete.js and UI Garage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, UI Garage seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

autoComplete.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of autoComplete.js yet. Tracking of autoComplete.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

UI Garage mentions (3)

  • Stuck Finding Inspiration? Try These Websites
    UI Garage: A great tool for finding good UX. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How do they do it?
    Hi guys. So I've been racking my brain around something lately, maybe you can shed some light. There are sites filled with UI strings popping up all over the web these days - like mobbin.com or uigarage.net or theappfuel.com. How do they do it? They sometimes post hundreds of new screenshots a week. I've tried it manually and it's too time-consuming, there's no way they're doing it by hand. Source: about 2 years ago
  • free-for.dev
    UI Garage - [Mobile and web screenshots] Daily UI inspiration & patterns for designers, developers to find inspiration, tools and the best resources for your project. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing autoComplete.js and UI Garage, you can also consider the following products

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

UI Movement - The best UI design inspiration, daily

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

Page Flows - User flow design inspiration for mobile & desktop

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

UpLabs - The best material design, iOS & web resources, every day