Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

autoComplete.js VS SendBird

Compare autoComplete.js VS SendBird and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.

SendBird logo SendBird

SendBird is messaging-as-a-service.
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12
  • SendBird Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17

SendBird

$ Details
-
Release Date
2013 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
California
City
San Mateo
Founder(s)
Brandon Y Jeon
Employees
100 - 249

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

SendBird features and specs

  • Scalability
    SendBird supports enterprise-level scalability, enabling businesses to handle millions of users and messages with ease.
  • Feature-rich
    The platform offers a wide range of features including chat, voice, and video capabilities, as well as support for rich media, GIFs, and file sharing.
  • Customizability
    SendBird provides extensive APIs and SDKs that allow developers to customize and integrate the chat functionality seamlessly into their applications.
  • Robust moderation tools
    The service includes powerful moderation tools such as profanity filters, user banning, and admin message controls, which are essential for maintaining community standards.
  • Real-time messaging
    SendBird offers low-latency, real-time messaging that ensures a smooth and interactive user experience.
  • Cross-platform support
    SendBird is compatible with various platforms including iOS, Android, and web, which ensures a consistent user experience across devices.
  • Analytics and reporting
    The platform provides comprehensive analytics and reporting tools that help businesses gain insights into user behavior and engagement.

Possible disadvantages of SendBird

  • Cost
    SendBird can be quite expensive, especially for startups and small businesses, with pricing plans that may not be feasible for all budgets.
  • Complex setup
    The platform's extensive features and customization options can result in a steep learning curve and a complex setup process for new users.
  • API limitations
    Some users have reported limitations and restrictions in the API that can hinder more advanced customizations and integrations.
  • Customer support
    While SendBird offers customer support, some users have experienced slower response times and less satisfactory support resolutions.
  • Third-party dependencies
    The platform's performance may be affected by third-party dependencies and integrations, which can introduce unpredictability in service reliability.

autoComplete.js videos

No autoComplete.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

SendBird videos

Sendbird Launches the Sendbird Calls API for In-app Voice and Video

More videos:

  • Review - The Beginning of SendBird and Entering Silicon Valley

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to autoComplete.js and SendBird)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Communication
0 0%
100% 100
Custom Search Engine
100 100%
0% 0
Chat SDK
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using autoComplete.js and SendBird. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare autoComplete.js and SendBird

autoComplete.js Reviews

We have no reviews of autoComplete.js yet.
Be the first one to post

SendBird Reviews

15 Best Twilio Alternatives 2022
Therefore, the biggest Sendbird’s advantage is something Twilio can’t do, and it’s to make an app social which is why Sendbird might be the right alternative for you if you run an app.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SendBird seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

autoComplete.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of autoComplete.js yet. Tracking of autoComplete.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

SendBird mentions (14)

  • Chat API pricing: Comparing MAU and per-minute consumption models
    The Monthly Active Users (MAU) model is one of the most widely used pricing models in the industry. Providers like CometChat, Sendbird, Twilio, and Stream charge based on the number of unique active users per month. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • WebSocket vs. HTTP communication protocols
    Fortunately, you don’t need to choose one over the other. The two communication protocols can, and often should, be used together, allowing each to do what it does best. If you need to implement real-time communication and streaming functionality in your applications, check out Sendbird. Sendbird’s APIs and client SDKs handle the technical heavy lifting for in-app chat, calls, and live streaming. Sendbird’s chat... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • SwiftUI vs. UIKit: What is the best choice for building an iOS user interface in 2024?
    After you've analyzed the SwiftUI vs. UIkit comparison, consider adding customer communications to your app to enhance user engagement, retention, and CSAT. You can do this with Sendbird, an all-in-one communications API platform for web and mobile apps. Sendbird's highly abstracted APIs empower developers to build robust and scalable communication experiences (for chat, notifications, and in-app calls) across web... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 5 Best Instant Messaging APIs
    Sendbird Chat enables developers to implement chat and instant messaging by providing an SDK with ready-made chat UI components. They cover all the essential features you might expect, including voice and video, which makes it possible to deliver a comprehensive experience. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Custom vs. off-the-shelf React web notification systems: Which is better?
    Sendbird focuses on in-app messaging but also offers push notifications. It's designed to be highly customizable and can be a great fit if you want to offer your users a more interactive experience. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing autoComplete.js and SendBird, you can also consider the following products

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

Twilio - Brings voice and messaging to your web and mobile applications.

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

GetStream.io - APIs for the development of scalable newsfeeds and chat applications.

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

Agora.io - Agora.io is a real-time communications provider delivering video and voice communications across devices and global networks.