Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

autoComplete.js VS React Native Starter

Compare autoComplete.js VS React Native Starter and see what are their differences

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.

React Native Starter logo React Native Starter

React Native Starter is mobile application template built with React Native that contains essential components for all mobile apps.
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12
  • React Native Starter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-12

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

React Native Starter features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Development
    React Native Starter allows developers to build mobile applications for both iOS and Android with a single codebase, saving time and resources.
  • Faster Development
    By using pre-built components and templates in React Native Starter, developers can accelerate the app development process and reduce time-to-market.
  • Community Support
    React Native and its associated tools, like React Native Starter, benefit from a large community, providing abundant resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries.
  • Cost Efficiency
    Using a starter kit like React Native Starter can reduce development costs due to its reusable components and lower maintenance requirements.

Possible disadvantages of React Native Starter

  • Performance Limitations
    While React Native offers near-native performance, there might still be limitations for highly demanding applications compared to purely native development.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers new to React Native or coming from other development backgrounds might experience a learning curve when adapting to React Native Starter.
  • Dependency Management
    React Native Starter relies on third-party libraries, which can lead to compatibility and dependency management challenges over time.
  • Limited Customization
    While starter kits provide useful templates and components, they may impose limitations on custom designs and features unique to specific business needs.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to autoComplete.js and React Native Starter)
Developer Tools
33 33%
67% 67
Custom Search Engine
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using autoComplete.js and React Native Starter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, React Native Starter seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

autoComplete.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of autoComplete.js yet. Tracking of autoComplete.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

React Native Starter mentions (1)

  • 12+ React Boilerplates & Starter Kits For Developers In 2021
    React Native Starter is a fancy starter kit available in bright colors, built with React Native like a project template for mobile application. React Native Starter got modular architecture, tons of inner components like sidebar, navigation, form elements to aid you in coding. Flatlogic provides full support and updates in the premium version of the starter kit. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing autoComplete.js and React Native Starter, you can also consider the following products

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

NativeBase - Experience the awesomeness of React Native without the pain

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

React Native Desktop - Build OS X desktop apps using React Native

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

Flatlogic - AI-Powered Software Development for Startups and Businesses