Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

autoComplete.js VS ProtoPie

Compare autoComplete.js VS ProtoPie and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.

ProtoPie logo ProtoPie

ProtoPie is the easiest tool used to turn your UI/UX design ideas into highly interactive prototypes for mobile, desktop, web, all the way to IoT.
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12
  • ProtoPie Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

ProtoPie is the easiest tool used to turn your UI/UX design ideas into highly interactive prototypes for mobile, desktop, web, all the way to IoT. Designers can explore, validate, and test design solutions and ideas by creating very realistic, production-like prototypes without code and the help of engineers.

Hence, ProtoPie helps companies to release better and validated products, allows them to go to market faster, and save costs throughout the process by revolutionizing their prototyping workflows.

ProtoPie is widely used at various companies all over the world across industries, e.g. Google, Microsoft, GoPro, Samsung, Nintendo, BMW, IDEO, Reddit, Bytedance, Huge, and Verizon.

autoComplete.js

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

ProtoPie

$ Details
paid Free Trial $13.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Windows iOS Mac OSX Android iPhone
Release Date
2014 January
Startup details
Country
South Korea
City
Seoul
Founder(s)
John Song
Employees
50 - 99

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

ProtoPie features and specs

  • Free Trial
    7 days and an additional 10 days for free
  • Easy to Set-up and use
    Incredibly easy due to its unique conceptual model
  • Integrations
    Sketch, Adobe XD, and Figma

Analysis of ProtoPie

Overall verdict

  • ProtoPie is a robust and versatile prototyping tool that is well-suited for creating interactive and realistic prototypes. It is highly recommended for users who require detailed and dynamic prototypes that go beyond basic designs.

Why this product is good

  • ProtoPie is generally considered a good tool for interactive prototyping due to its powerful features that allow designers to create high-fidelity prototypes with advanced interactions. It supports interaction with various sensors and hardware capabilities, making it ideal for testing highly interactive concepts. The interface is user-friendly, and it does not require a background in coding to create complex prototypes, which is appreciated by both designers and developers.

Recommended for

  • UX/UI designers looking for advanced prototyping capabilities.
  • Design teams needing to demonstrate complex interactions and animations.
  • Professionals working on projects that require integration with device sensors and hardware.
  • Individuals or teams who do not want to write code to achieve high fidelity in prototypes.

autoComplete.js videos

No autoComplete.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

ProtoPie videos

Intro to ProtoPie 4

More videos:

  • Review - ProtoPie ProtoTyping - I've never tried this software before, let's try it out

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to autoComplete.js and ProtoPie)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Prototyping
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using autoComplete.js and ProtoPie. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare autoComplete.js and ProtoPie

autoComplete.js Reviews

We have no reviews of autoComplete.js yet.
Be the first one to post

ProtoPie Reviews

Top 5 Zeplin Alternative
Protopie is another good alternative to Zeplin worth giving a try. It offers an amazing platform to design great user interfaces. It provides powerful interactions ranging from simple ones to those using Excel-grade formulas without writing any piece of code. Utilize the unique conceptual model to create the best and interactive prototypes. Each interaction in protopie...
Top 6 Figma Alternatives: Prototyping and UI/UX Tools
Explicitly focused on interactive prototyping, ProtoPie offers high fidelity and control over micro-interactions and animations. Its intuitive interface and support for complex interactions make it a preferred choice for designers working on mobile apps and web interfaces.
Source: fronty.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ProtoPie seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

autoComplete.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of autoComplete.js yet. Tracking of autoComplete.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

ProtoPie mentions (1)

  • What’s your preference: ProtoPie, Principle, or prototyping directly in Figma?
    Https://protopie.io Try it and see for yourself. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing autoComplete.js and ProtoPie, you can also consider the following products

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

Figma - Team-based interface design, Figma lets you collaborate on designs in real time.

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

Invision - Prototyping and collaboration for design teams

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

Adobe XD - Adobe XD is an all-in-one UX/UI solution for designing websites, mobile apps and more.