Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

autoComplete.js VS OpenMoji 12.0

Compare autoComplete.js VS OpenMoji 12.0 and see what are their differences

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.

OpenMoji 12.0 logo OpenMoji 12.0

Open source Unicode-compliant Emojis for everyone
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12
  • OpenMoji 12.0 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-11

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

OpenMoji 12.0 features and specs

  • Open Source
    OpenMoji 12.0 is open source, meaning it's freely available for use, modification, and distribution, which promotes collaboration and adaptation.
  • Diversity of Emojis
    The library includes a wide range of emojis, offering vast options for expression, which can enhance communication.
  • Community-Driven
    Being community-driven, OpenMoji benefits from contributions and updates by users worldwide, ensuring it evolves with user needs.
  • Educational Use
    OpenMoji is developed with an educational approach, making it suitable for academic and non-commercial projects.

Possible disadvantages of OpenMoji 12.0

  • Inconsistency with Proprietary Emojis
    OpenMoji's design may not match proprietary emoji sets exactly, which can lead to differences in appearance across platforms.
  • Limited Adoption
    As an open-source project, OpenMoji may not yet have the widespread adoption of more established proprietary libraries, which could affect recognition.
  • Less Detailed Designs
    Emojis in OpenMoji might be less detailed compared to other commercially-driven emoji sets, potentially impacting user experience.
  • Resource Requirements
    Using OpenMoji requires integration work, which could be resource-intensive for developers unfamiliar with the open-source ecosystem.

autoComplete.js videos

No autoComplete.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

OpenMoji 12.0 videos

OpenMoji 12.0 (3180 Emojis)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to autoComplete.js and OpenMoji 12.0)
Developer Tools
54 54%
46% 46
Emojis
0 0%
100% 100
Custom Search Engine
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using autoComplete.js and OpenMoji 12.0. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OpenMoji 12.0 seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

autoComplete.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of autoComplete.js yet. Tracking of autoComplete.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

OpenMoji 12.0 mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing autoComplete.js and OpenMoji 12.0, you can also consider the following products

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

EmojiOne for Chrome - Finally, an emoji keyboard for the modern desktop.

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

JoyPixels - Freemium set of 3,057 native emoji icons ✨

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

Sensa Emoji - Free, vector, and open-source emoji set