Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

autoComplete.js VS FreeFormatter

Compare autoComplete.js VS FreeFormatter and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.

FreeFormatter logo FreeFormatter

Freeformatter is a platform that contains free online tools for developers, including formatters (json, html, xml, sql, etc.), minifiers (css, javascript), compactors, validators, and much more.
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12
  • FreeFormatter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-25

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

FreeFormatter features and specs

  • Wide Range of Tools
    FreeFormatter offers various tools for formatting, converting, and validating data, which can be very helpful for developers and data analysts working with different data formats.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The website features a simple and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to find and use the tools they need without requiring technical expertise.
  • No Installation Required
    Being a web-based tool, it requires no installation, making it accessible from any device with an internet connection.
  • Free to Use
    Most tools on FreeFormatter are free to use, which can be appealing for individuals or organizations with limited budgets.

Possible disadvantages of FreeFormatter

  • Limited Functionality for Complex Needs
    The tools are ideal for basic tasks but may not offer the advanced features needed for more complex data processing or large-scale projects.
  • Dependence on Internet Connectivity
    Since the tools are web-based, they require an internet connection, which can be a limitation for users with unstable access.
  • Privacy Concerns
    There may be privacy concerns related to uploading sensitive data to an online service, even though the site might ensure data security.
  • Ads and Pop-Ups
    The website contains advertisements, which can be distracting and could potentially impact the user experience.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to autoComplete.js and FreeFormatter)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Image Optimisation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using autoComplete.js and FreeFormatter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing autoComplete.js and FreeFormatter, you can also consider the following products

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

JSONFormatter.org - Online JSON Formatter and JSON Validator will format JSON data, and helps to validate, convert JSON to XML, JSON to CSV. Save and Share JSON

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

JSONLint - JSON Lint is a web based validator and reformatter for JSON, a lightweight data-interchange format.

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

XMLable - XMLable is an online toolbox designed for working with XML, offering tools such as a formatter, validator, comparator, generator, XPath tester, XSD generator, and XSL transformation.