Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

autoComplete.js VS DaisyUI

Compare autoComplete.js VS DaisyUI and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.

DaisyUI logo DaisyUI

Free UI components plugin for Tailwind CSS
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12
  • DaisyUI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

DaisyUI features and specs

  • Customizability
    DaisyUI allows for deep customization with support for custom themes and component variations, enabling developers to adapt the UI to specific project needs.
  • Ease of Use
    DaisyUI is designed to be user-friendly with intuitive class names and accessible components, reducing the learning curve for new users.
  • TailwindCSS Integration
    Built on top of TailwindCSS, DaisyUI provides the utility-first approach of Tailwind with additional pre-styled components, offering the best of both worlds.
  • Consistent Design
    It offers a consistent design language with a comprehensive collection of UI components, ensuring a cohesive look and feel across a project.
  • Active Development
    The project is actively maintained, with frequent updates and new features being added, ensuring ongoing improvements and stability.

Possible disadvantages of DaisyUI

  • Dependency on TailwindCSS
    Since DaisyUI is an extension of TailwindCSS, projects need to include and configure TailwindCSS, which may add complexity for those unfamiliar with Tailwind.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its ease of use, there might be an initial learning curve for developers who are not already familiar with utility-first CSS frameworks like TailwindCSS.
  • Opinionated Design
    DaisyUI comes with its own set of design opinions and styles which might not align with every project's requirements, potentially requiring additional customization.
  • Limited Community
    While growing, the community around DaisyUI is smaller compared to more established UI libraries, which may result in less available support and fewer third-party resources.
  • Performance Overhead
    Adding another layer on top of TailwindCSS might introduce additional performance overhead, especially in large-scale applications with numerous components.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to autoComplete.js and DaisyUI)

autoComplete.js

DaisyUI

Developer Tools
8 8%
Developer Tools
92% 92
Design Tools
0 0%
Design Tools
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Web App
100 100%
Web App
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using autoComplete.js and DaisyUI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare autoComplete.js and DaisyUI

autoComplete.js Reviews

We have no reviews of autoComplete.js yet.
Be the first one to post

DaisyUI Reviews

Tailwind CSS: 15 Component Libraries & UI Kits
This is quite an interesting addition to this list. You'll first notice that daisyUI uses a custom - simpler - syntax for its components. In fact, whereas you'd need to write several utilities to style a button with raw Tailwind - daisyUI does it with a single "btn" tag.
Source: stackdiary.com
22 Best Sites for Free Tailwind Components
DaisyUI adds all standard UI components to Tailwind CSS, including buttons, cards, and more. By doing so, we can focus on the most critical aspects of each project rather than creating essential elements for them all. You can customize everything in DaisyUI using Tailwind CSS utility classes because Tailwind components have low CSS specificities.
Source: tylerthetech.com
How to Choose a Tailwind Component Library (Plus the Top 6 Options)
With 48 components, over 15,000 GitHub Stars, and over 2 million NPM installs, daisyUI is one of the more popular inclusions in this list. Designed to be used as a plugin with TailwindCSS, daisyUI adds multiple utility classes for you to use in place of the original TailwindCSS ones. For example, now you can use the btn class to get a button with the classes inline-block...
Source: prismic.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, DaisyUI seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 158 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

autoComplete.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of autoComplete.js yet. Tracking of autoComplete.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

DaisyUI mentions (158)

  • SonicScan - A Music Fingerprinting and Identification App
    Then I learned Tauri and used my favourite frontend framework SolidJS with TailwindCSS and DaisyUI to build the UI with MotionOne to add animations and Tauri to build the desktop/web/android/ios app. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • Cut the Crap: Ship Better-Looking Websites (Fast)
    Other Tailwind Libraries: If the Shadcn approach isn't your jam, there are libraries like Flowbite or DaisyUI. They offer ready-made components styled with Tailwind, often installed as dependencies. Providing similar speed benefits for common patterns. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Shadcn UI: Revamp your legacy React app with minimal effort
    It’s difficult to go back to Material UI or Daisy UI in 2025 once you get into Shadcn. It became my go-to choice and potentially one of my primary reasons I’d opt for https://nextjs.org/ when I create a quick side-project or proof of concept. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • TailwindCSS & DaisyUI in the Shadow DOM
    However, using popular styling frameworks like TailwindCSS and DaisyUI inside the Shadow DOM isn’t straightforward. Since styles in the Shadow DOM don’t inherit from the global stylesheet, you need a strategy to ensure your component still benefits from Tailwind’s utility classes and DaisyUI’s prebuilt components. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • The State of Open-Source Tailwind CSS Component Frameworks: A Developer's Guide
    DaisyUI has established itself as a foundational component library in the Tailwind ecosystem. It offers a familiar, Bootstrap-like development experience. Its semantic class system simplifies component reuse, providing pre-styled elements without requiring proprietary dependencies. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing autoComplete.js and DaisyUI, you can also consider the following products

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

Tailwind UI - Beautiful UI components by the creators of Tailwind CSS.

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

FlowBite - Build UI interfaces and simplify the process of integrating into live websites with Tailwind CSS

Loading...