Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

autoComplete.js VS Appcues

Compare autoComplete.js VS Appcues and see what are their differences

UserGuiding
Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.

Appcues logo Appcues

Improve user onboarding, feature activation & more — no code required! Stop waiting on dev and start increasing customer engagement today. Try it for free.
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12
  • Appcues Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

Appcues features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Appcues offers a user-friendly interface that allows non-technical users to create and deploy in-app guides, modals, and tool-tips without needing to write any code.
  • Customization
    It provides extensive customization options, allowing businesses to tailor user experiences to align with their branding and specific user needs.
  • Integrations
    Appcues integrates seamlessly with various third-party tools like Slack, Segment, and Google Analytics, enhancing its functionality and ease of data collection.
  • Analytics
    Offers rich analytics that help track user interaction, engagement, and the effectiveness of in-app guides and tutorials.
  • A/B Testing
    Supports A/B testing of user onboarding flows and in-app messages to optimize user engagement strategies.

Possible disadvantages of Appcues

  • Cost
    Appcues can be expensive for smaller businesses or startups, particularly when additional features and higher user limits are required.
  • Learning Curve
    While the platform is user-friendly, there can be an initial learning curve for users who are not familiar with onboarding tools.
  • Performance Impact
    Some users have reported that the use of Appcues can slow down their application, impacting overall performance.
  • Limited Mobile Support
    Appcues' mobile support is not as robust as its desktop counterpart, which may be a limitation for businesses prioritizing mobile user experiences.
  • Content Limitations
    Certain complex use cases or highly customized flows might be challenging to implement with Appcues' built-in tools.

autoComplete.js videos

No autoComplete.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Appcues videos

+ Add

Appcues - Product-Led Growth Review

More videos:

  • Review - Growth Talks #11 - Appcues & Userpilot - Homepage & Pricing Review - user onboarding apps!
  • Tutorial - How to Nail User Onboarding - Appcues

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to autoComplete.js and Appcues)

autoComplete.js

Appcues

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
User Onboarding And Engagement
0 0%
User Onboarding And Engagement
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
User Experience
0 0%
User Experience
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using autoComplete.js and Appcues. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare autoComplete.js and Appcues

autoComplete.js Reviews

We have no reviews of autoComplete.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Appcues Reviews

15 best user onboarding software you need to try in 2023
It probably scores a little higher than Userpilot in terms of its visual styling and customization options, which are very easy on the eye. Appcues would be a good choice if you’re onboarding a design, ecommerce, or creativity tool. Among its clients are content-creation tool Writer and video collaboration platform Frame.io.
Source: www.marketermilk.com
8 Best Usetiful Alternatives and Competitors That Are More Professional
Appcues’s analytics isn’t much different from it’s close competitors, such as UserGuiding or Pendo. You can see al the data of your guides, surveys, checklists, and so on. What makes Appcues’s analytics strong are the “journeys” and “experiments” features, which allow you to play with custom parameters and dive deep into details.
Source: userguiding.com
The 7 Best WalkMe Alternatives in 2023
Its A/B testing and optimization features enable continuous improvement of user experiences. If you're seeking a no-code solution with powerful optimization capabilities, Appcues is an attractive option.
Source: helpjuice.com
Appcues Alternatives and Competitors
Even though it’s a “no-code” software, Appcues is not as easy-to-use as you might expect. If you have a small team with limited time, Appcues might not be for you because it still requires some time to be invested in the platform before you can effectively create onboarding flows. For the startups and SME’s Appcues might be on the expensive side of the onboarding tools.
Source: blog.userguiding.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing autoComplete.js and Appcues, you can also consider the following products

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

UserGuiding - Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement.

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

WalkMe - WalkMe is a game-changing platform that instantly simplifies the online user experience.

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

Userlane - Digital adoption platform with interactive guidance for software applications allowing anyone to understand and master any software from the get-go.

Loading...