Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Audio Hijack VS Frisby.js

Compare Audio Hijack VS Frisby.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Audio Hijack logo Audio Hijack

Record any audio, with Audio Hijack!

Frisby.js logo Frisby.js

Frisby.js is a framework builder that uses fast and easy-to-use REST API testing.
  • Audio Hijack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-13
  • Frisby.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Audio Hijack features and specs

  • Versatility
    Audio Hijack allows you to capture audio from any application on your Mac, making it highly versatile for various needs, including podcasts, interviews, and music recording.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The software offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all skill levels.
  • Real-time Audio Processing
    Audio Hijack features real-time audio processing capabilities, allowing users to apply effects and filters as the audio is being captured.
  • Scheduling
    The built-in scheduling feature allows users to set up automatic recordings at specified times, which is useful for capturing live streams or radio shows.
  • High-quality Recording
    Audio Hijack supports high-quality audio formats, ensuring that recordings are of professional grade.

Possible disadvantages of Audio Hijack

  • Price
    The software is relatively expensive compared to other audio recording tools, which might be a barrier for some users.
  • Mac-only
    Audio Hijack is only available for macOS, limiting its usability for Windows and Linux users.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    While the basic features are easy to use, some advanced features may have a steeper learning curve.
  • No Multi-track Recording
    Audio Hijack does not support multi-track recording within a single session, which can be limiting for complex projects.
  • Resource Intensive
    The software can be resource-intensive, potentially affecting the performance of older or less powerful Mac systems.

Frisby.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Audio Hijack

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Audio Hijack is considered an excellent tool for anyone seeking a reliable and feature-rich audio recording and processing solution on macOS. Its intuitive design combined with professional-grade features earns it high marks from both casual users and audio experts alike.

Why this product is good

  • Audio Hijack by Rogue Amoeba is renowned for its versatility and robust features that appeal to users who need to capture audio from a variety of sources on macOS. It offers a user-friendly interface with powerful capabilities such as scheduled recordings, multiple format support, extensive audio processing tools, and integration with other audio software. These features make it a go-to tool for podcasters, musicians, and audio professionals who require precise control over their audio recording and manipulation.

Recommended for

  • Podcasters looking for seamless audio recording and processing.
  • Musicians and producers who need to capture and manipulate audio from different sources.
  • Educators and content creators requiring high-quality audio for their projects.
  • Users who need to record audio for webinars, video conferencing, or online streams.

Audio Hijack videos

How I Use Audio Hijack (Review)

More videos:

  • Review - How I Record Podcasts with Audio Hijack
  • Review - Audio Hijack 3 Review

Frisby.js videos

No Frisby.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Audio Hijack and Frisby.js)
Audio
100 100%
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100
Audio & Music
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Audio Hijack and Frisby.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Audio Hijack and Frisby.js

Audio Hijack Reviews

  1. Word.Studio
    · Editor at Word.Studio ·
    An essential tool for podcast or video producers who work with audio.

    Once you figure out how to use it, it is very easy to capture any audio coming out of your speakers. It is nice to be able to isolate the audio captured to only record from a specific app. So if you are trying to capture audio from a browser, and a notification from your messages app comes in, the notification "chime" from the messages will not be captured and you'll get a clean capture only from the browser (or other app you might specify). You can also capture from two different sources and mix the levels in real time as you capture. So you can record a zoom call and also record music you might play in a separate app, and adjust the mix to your liking.

    👍 Pros:    Macos|Simple yet flexible|Free version is very usable|Ability to mix and add filters to captured audio in real time
    👎 Cons:    Learning curve

Frisby.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Frisby.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Audio Hijack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 64 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Audio Hijack mentions (64)

  • Ask HN: Is anyone making money selling traditional downloadable software?
    I don't know if they're making money, but they're charging money and I'm paying it. a) Audio Hijack [1] - software that should be part of macOS where you can route the audio output of any program to the audio input of any other program. b) Eazy Draw [2] - I have clients with massive legacy libraries of commercial AppleWorks drawings, and EazyDraw is the only product I could find that would open/convert them. I... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • EQ Mac audio INPUT?
    This is the basic idea, but there are other apps which can make it easier. I prefer using Audio Hijack for the EQ part and sending it to a pass-through device set up in Loopback (which, for this use case, functions the same as BlackHole). Source: over 1 year ago
  • Upgrading my gear, need some advice for recording multiple people
    - Audio Hijack (also by Rogue Ameba) so I can record myself, the soundboard, and QuickTime all to individual .aiff files. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Why does Mac doesn't record internal audio?
    Another option that has been around for a long time. https://rogueamoeba.com/audiohijack/. Source: about 2 years ago
  • MacOS Audio API
    Definitely doable though might point to Rogue Amoeba re: implementation/execution particularly: SoundSource, Loopback & Audio Hijack. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Frisby.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Frisby.js yet. Tracking of Frisby.js recommendations started around Jul 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Audio Hijack and Frisby.js, you can also consider the following products

Loopback by RogueAmoeba - Get all the power of a high-end studio mixing board, right inside your Mac!

Audacity - Audacity is a free and open-source audio production software suite that includes a surprising array of editing tools and recording systems.

Nest.js - A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient, reliable and scalable server-side applications.

Adobe Audition - Mix, edit, and create audio content in Adobe Audition CC with a comprehensive toolset that includes multitrack, waveform, and spectral display.

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

Piezo - Piezo makes it a snap to record audio on your Mac.