Atomize by Quarkly VS Sitecake

Atomize by Quarkly

Library for creating atomic react components

Sitecake

Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.

Landing page //
2020-08-05

Our Quarkly project is a mix of a graphic editor (like Figma and Sketch) and website builder (similar to Webflow), complemented by features of traditional IDE. We’ll be sure to elaborate on Quarkly in a separate post, as there is plenty to tell and show, but today we’ll focus on the details of the Atomize tool.

Atomize is the heart of the whole project, as it allows us to solve tasks that would be difficult or even impossible to handle using styled-system and rebass. At the very least, the latter solution is much less elegant.

Landing page //
2022-09-11

Atomize by Quarkly

Website: atomize.quarkly.io
$ Details: free

Edit details

Sitecake

Website: sitecake.com
$ Details: -

Edit details

Atomize by Quarkly videos

No Atomize by Quarkly videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Sitecake videos

+ Add

Editing a Website with Sitecake CMS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Atomize by Quarkly and Sitecake)

Atomize by Quarkly

Sitecake

Design Tools

100 100%

Design Tools

0% 0

CMS

0 0%

CMS

100% 100

Website Builder

100 100%

Website Builder

0% 0

Blogging Platform

0 0%

Blogging Platform

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Atomize by Quarkly and Sitecake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sitecake seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Atomize by Quarkly mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Atomize by Quarkly yet. Tracking of Atomize by Quarkly recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Sitecake mentions (5)

Maintaining this site fucking sucks
Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Publii: Open-source local WYSIWYG static site CMS
I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Best solution that would give clients the ability to edit content on their extremely minimal/simple site?
Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago
Conventional approach to allowing business owner to edit static site?
May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
Do you know any No-Code CMS or Data-Base for self-hosted Webflow Sites?
Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago