Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Atlassian Fisheye VS Apache HTTP Server

Compare Atlassian Fisheye VS Apache HTTP Server and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Atlassian Fisheye logo Atlassian Fisheye

With FishEye you can search code, visualize and report on activity and find for commits, files, revisions, or teammates across SVN, Git, Mercurial, CVS and Perforce.

Apache HTTP Server logo Apache HTTP Server

Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996
  • Atlassian Fisheye Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04
  • Apache HTTP Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21

Atlassian Fisheye features and specs

  • Code Search
    FishEye provides advanced search capabilities, allowing users to search codebases effectively with powerful filters and syntax search options.
  • Integration with Crucible
    FishEye integrates seamlessly with Crucible, Atlassian's code review tool, making it easier to conduct code reviews and improve code quality within the same ecosystem.
  • Repository Visualization
    The tool offers visualization options to view repository activity, track changes, and understand the evolution of a project over time, aiding in project management and analysis.
  • Multiple SCM Support
    FishEye supports various source control management systems like Git, Mercurial, Subversion, CVS, and Perforce, making it versatile for different development environments.

Possible disadvantages of Atlassian Fisheye

  • Cost
    Compared to some open-source alternatives, FishEye can be relatively expensive, which might be a drawback for smaller teams or budget-conscious organizations.
  • Complexity
    The setup and configuration process can be complex, especially for teams unfamiliar with Atlassian products, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report performance slowdowns when indexing large repositories, which can affect productivity if not managed properly.
  • Limited Standalone Features
    While powerful, FishEye's full potential is often realized only when used in conjunction with other Atlassian tools, which could be limiting for users seeking a standalone solution.

Apache HTTP Server features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache HTTP Server is open source, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. This promotes a large, active community that contributes to its maintenance and improvement.
  • Cross-Platform
    Apache is compatible with a variety of operating systems, including Unix, Linux, and Windows, providing flexibility and widespread usability.
  • Highly Customizable
    It offers a modular architecture that allows users to enable or disable features as needed, and to extend functionality through modules.
  • Robust Documentation
    Apache provides comprehensive and detailed documentation, which makes it easier for users to install, configure, and troubleshoot the server.
  • Widespread Adoption
    With its long history and widespread use, Apache has proven to be reliable and trusted by many organizations worldwide, ensuring a level of trust and stability.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Apache includes many features out-of-the-box, such as SSL/TLS support, URL redirection, authentication, load balancing, and more.

Possible disadvantages of Apache HTTP Server

  • Performance Overhead
    Compared to some lightweight web servers like Nginx, Apache can have higher memory and CPU usage, which may not be ideal for high concurrency needs.
  • Complex Configuration
    Apache's extensive customization options can lead to a complex configuration process, which may be challenging for beginners or those without specific expertise.
  • Less Efficient in Serving Static Content
    While Apache is highly capable, it may be less efficient at serving static content compared to specialized web servers like Nginx.
  • Initial Learning Curve
    Due to its rich features and configurability, new users might face a steep learning curve when first setting up and using Apache HTTP Server.
  • Module Compatibility Issues
    Sometimes, third-party modules may not always be compatible with the latest versions of Apache, causing potential integration issues.

Atlassian Fisheye videos

+ Add

Atlassian FishEye

More videos:

  • Review - Atlassian FishEye Overview Video

Apache HTTP Server videos

No Apache HTTP Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Atlassian Fisheye and Apache HTTP Server)

Atlassian Fisheye

Apache HTTP Server

Git
100 100%
Git
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
0 0%
Web And Application Servers
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
Web Servers
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Atlassian Fisheye and Apache HTTP Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Atlassian Fisheye and Apache HTTP Server

Atlassian Fisheye Reviews

We have no reviews of Atlassian Fisheye yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

9 Best XAMPP Alternatives Cross Platform Web Server
However, compared to XAMPP and other popular web servers in the market Apache HTTP Server is a bit more complicated and is a little difficult to navigate for a complete newbie, but if you want to understand web development from the very fundamentals and understand how Apache as a web server software works then this software can be of great help to you.
Source: technicalustad.com
Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
The most commonly used Web Server is by far Apache HTTP Server from the Software Apache Foundation. Created in 1995 by Rob McCool and Brian Behlendorf, among others. The name is a pun for A PatCHy server, as at the time of it’s inception, Apache was based on some existing code, along with some perhaps “hacky or clunky” software packages, enabling it to run. Additionally, the...
Source: chemicloud.com
10 Best alternatives of XAMPP servers for Windows, Linux and macOS
Apache is an open-source and free web server software that owns about 46% of websites worldwide. The official name is Apache HTTP Server and is maintained and developed by the Apache Software Foundation. This allows website owners to serve content on the web – hence the name “webserver”.
Source: www.isrgrajan.com
Top 5 open source web servers
As the Apache HTTP Server has been the most popular web server since 1996, it "benefits from great documentation and integrated support from other software projects." You can find more information on the Apache Foundation project page.
Source: opensource.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache HTTP Server seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 65 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Atlassian Fisheye mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Atlassian Fisheye yet. Tracking of Atlassian Fisheye recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache HTTP Server mentions (65)

  • Open Source: A Goldmine for Indie Hackers
    Open source software is built on the democratic idea that everyone should be able to inspect and contribute to the source code. Major projects like Linux, WordPress, and the Apache HTTP Server have shown how collaborative efforts can produce robust, scalable solutions. Indie hackers, often working with limited budgets, gain access to highly dependable tools such as Python and MySQL, which were originally developed... - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
  • Unveiling a Licensing Legend: The Netscape Public License 1.1
    The Netscape Public License 1.1 served as a crucial stepping stone for modern open source licensing models. Developed by Netscape Communications Corporation, it was designed to encourage global community collaboration while safeguarding intellectual property. During the rise of the open source movement, the license provided a much-needed balance between transparency and control, making it a frequent subject of... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Unveiling GNU FDL 1.2: A Deep Dive into Free Documentation Licensing
    Adoption, Use Cases, and Comparative Analysis: Projects ranging from community manuals to major software endeavors like the Apache HTTP Server have adopted the GNU FDL 1.2 to preserve the spirit of open documentation. While its copyleft nature ensures that every modification remains free, critics argue that the rigidity of the license may deter commercial integration. This is contrasted with alternative licensing... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Unveiling GNU FDL 1.1: A Deep Dive into Free Documentation Licensing
    GNU FDL 1.1 was created by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) with the intent of bringing the same freedoms found in free software to documentation. Many notable projects, including those under the aegis of the Apache HTTP Server, have benefited from a documentation license that guarantees continued openness and proper attribution. Throughout our exploration, we will delve into the evolution, strengths, and... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Unveiling SISSL 1.1: A New Era in Open Source Fairness
    Community Engagement and Legal Robustness: The license has garnered attention not just for its legal precision but also for its emphasis on community fairness. Developers find reassurance in clear, transparent clauses that protect their rights while simultaneously opening avenues for innovation. The Apache HTTP Server serves as one notable example of a project that embraced similar principles in fostering a... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Atlassian Fisheye and Apache HTTP Server, you can also consider the following products

WPMU DEV - WPMU offers WordPress Plugins, WordPress Themes, WordPress Multisite and BuddyPress Plugins and Themes.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

MAMP - MAMP is the abbreviation for Macintosh, Apache, MySQL, and PHP. It is a reliable application with its four components that allows you to access the local PHP server as well as the database server (SQL).

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Firefox Developer Edition - Built for those who build the Web. The only browser made for developers.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Loading...