Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Atlassian Bitbucket Server VS Tower

Compare Atlassian Bitbucket Server VS Tower and see what are their differences

Atlassian Bitbucket Server logo Atlassian Bitbucket Server

Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

Tower logo Tower

Build Better Software. Over 100,000 developers and designers are more productive with Tower - the most powerful Git client for Mac and Windows.
  • Atlassian Bitbucket Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30
  • Tower Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-08-22

Atlassian Bitbucket Server features and specs

  • Scalability
    Bitbucket Server can be scaled easily to support large and growing teams, making it suitable for enterprises.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products like Jira and Confluence, enhancing productivity and collaboration.
  • Data Control
    Being self-hosted, Bitbucket Server allows organizations to have complete control over their data and security settings.
  • Customization
    Support for custom hooks and add-ons allows for high levels of customization to meet specific workflow requirements.
  • Performance
    Optimized for performance to handle large repositories and numerous concurrent users efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Atlassian Bitbucket Server

  • Cost
    The cost for the data center edition can be high, especially for smaller teams or startups.
  • Maintenance
    Requires dedicated resources for server maintenance, updates, and troubleshooting, adding to the operational overhead.
  • Complexity
    Setup and configuration can be complex, often necessitating specialized knowledge or training.
  • Limited Cloud Features
    May lack some features and the ease of use found in cloud-based solutions, which can be a drawback for teams looking for a more straightforward setup.
  • Resource Intensive
    Can be resource-intensive, requiring powerful hardware to run efficiently, especially for larger installations.

Tower features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Tower offers a visually intuitive interface, making it easier for users to understand complex Git operations compared to the command line.
  • Advanced Git Features
    It supports advanced Git features like submodules, interactive rebase, and stashing, which makes it powerful for experienced developers.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Tower is available for both macOS and Windows, providing a consistent experience across major operating systems.
  • Enhanced Productivity
    Features like drag-and-drop to create, rename or delete branches, one-click undo, and quick actions streamline daily Git tasks.
  • Excellent Documentation & Support
    Tower provides comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and a dedicated support team to assist users.
  • Integration with Popular Services
    It integrates seamlessly with popular services like GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and others, enhancing workflow automation.

Possible disadvantages of Tower

  • Cost
    Tower is a paid application with a subscription model, which might not be suitable for all budgets, particularly for individual developers or small teams.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Beginners
    Despite its intuitive interface, beginners might find mastering all the features daunting without some prior knowledge of Git.
  • Resource Intensive
    Being a graphical application, Tower can be resource-intensive compared to command-line Git, affecting performance on lower-end machines.
  • Limited Customization
    There are fewer customization options compared to some other Git clients or command-line tools, potentially limiting how power users can tailor their workflow.
  • Dependency on GUI
    Reliance on a graphical user interface might slow down certain advanced users who are accustomed to the speed of command-line operations.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server videos

No Atlassian Bitbucket Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Tower videos

Tower - A Better Way to Work with Git

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Atlassian Bitbucket Server and Tower)
Git
38 38%
62% 62
Code Collaboration
48 48%
52% 52
Version Control
58 58%
42% 42
Git Tools
29 29%
71% 71

User comments

Share your experience with using Atlassian Bitbucket Server and Tower. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Atlassian Bitbucket Server and Tower

Atlassian Bitbucket Server Reviews

We have no reviews of Atlassian Bitbucket Server yet.
Be the first one to post

Tower Reviews

Boost Development Productivity With These 14 Git Clients for Windows and Mac
Tower Git Client helps you manage large development projects and is also ideal for projects that need scaling up. It is a premium git GUI client for Windows and macOS computers.
Source: geekflare.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Atlassian Bitbucket Server and Tower, you can also consider the following products

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

GitKraken - The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.

SourceTree - Mac and Windows client for Mercurial and Git.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Azure DevOps - Visual Studio dev tools & services make app development easy for any platform & language. Try our Mac & Windows code editor, IDE, or Azure DevOps for free.