Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Atlassian Bitbucket Server VS MKS Source

Compare Atlassian Bitbucket Server VS MKS Source and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Atlassian Bitbucket Server logo Atlassian Bitbucket Server

Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

MKS Source logo MKS Source

A Unified Engineering Platform for Product Development
  • Atlassian Bitbucket Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30
  • MKS Source Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06

Atlassian Bitbucket Server features and specs

  • Scalability
    Bitbucket Server can be scaled easily to support large and growing teams, making it suitable for enterprises.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products like Jira and Confluence, enhancing productivity and collaboration.
  • Data Control
    Being self-hosted, Bitbucket Server allows organizations to have complete control over their data and security settings.
  • Customization
    Support for custom hooks and add-ons allows for high levels of customization to meet specific workflow requirements.
  • Performance
    Optimized for performance to handle large repositories and numerous concurrent users efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Atlassian Bitbucket Server

  • Cost
    The cost for the data center edition can be high, especially for smaller teams or startups.
  • Maintenance
    Requires dedicated resources for server maintenance, updates, and troubleshooting, adding to the operational overhead.
  • Complexity
    Setup and configuration can be complex, often necessitating specialized knowledge or training.
  • Limited Cloud Features
    May lack some features and the ease of use found in cloud-based solutions, which can be a drawback for teams looking for a more straightforward setup.
  • Resource Intensive
    Can be resource-intensive, requiring powerful hardware to run efficiently, especially for larger installations.

MKS Source features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Atlassian Bitbucket Server and MKS Source)

Atlassian Bitbucket Server

MKS Source

Git
91 91%
Git
9% 9
Code Collaboration
90 90%
Code Collaboration
10% 10
Version Control
92 92%
Version Control
8% 8
Git Tools
76 76%
Git Tools
24% 24

User comments

Share your experience with using Atlassian Bitbucket Server and MKS Source. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Atlassian Bitbucket Server and MKS Source, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

GitKraken - The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.

Git for Windows - We bring the awesome Git SCM to Windows

darcs - Darcs is an advanced revision control system, for source code or other files.

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.

Loading...