Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Atlassian Bitbucket Server VS lazygit

Compare Atlassian Bitbucket Server VS lazygit and see what are their differences

Atlassian Bitbucket Server logo Atlassian Bitbucket Server

Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

lazygit logo lazygit

Simple terminal UI for git commands.
  • Atlassian Bitbucket Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30
  • lazygit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

Atlassian Bitbucket Server features and specs

  • Scalability
    Bitbucket Server can be scaled easily to support large and growing teams, making it suitable for enterprises.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products like Jira and Confluence, enhancing productivity and collaboration.
  • Data Control
    Being self-hosted, Bitbucket Server allows organizations to have complete control over their data and security settings.
  • Customization
    Support for custom hooks and add-ons allows for high levels of customization to meet specific workflow requirements.
  • Performance
    Optimized for performance to handle large repositories and numerous concurrent users efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Atlassian Bitbucket Server

  • Cost
    The cost for the data center edition can be high, especially for smaller teams or startups.
  • Maintenance
    Requires dedicated resources for server maintenance, updates, and troubleshooting, adding to the operational overhead.
  • Complexity
    Setup and configuration can be complex, often necessitating specialized knowledge or training.
  • Limited Cloud Features
    May lack some features and the ease of use found in cloud-based solutions, which can be a drawback for teams looking for a more straightforward setup.
  • Resource Intensive
    Can be resource-intensive, requiring powerful hardware to run efficiently, especially for larger installations.

lazygit features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Lazygit provides an intuitive terminal user interface (TUI) for managing git repositories. It simplifies complex git tasks and makes them more accessible for users who are not comfortable with the command line.
  • Speed and Efficiency
    With keybindings and an efficient layout, lazygit can significantly speed up git workflows. Common tasks like staging, committing, and switching branches can be performed more quickly.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Lazygit is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for users across different platforms.
  • Interactive UI
    The interactive UI of lazygit allows users to visualize changes, diffs, and logs in a more comprehensible way compared to traditional command-line interfaces.
  • Ease of Installation
    Lazygit is straightforward to install, often requiring just a few commands, making it accessible even for those with limited technical knowledge.

Possible disadvantages of lazygit

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, lazygit introduces a new set of keybindings and interfaces that users must learn, which could be a barrier for some.
  • Limited Customization
    Lazygit may lack the deep customization options available in other git clients or command-line tools, potentially limiting power users who need highly specific configurations.
  • Dependent on Terminal
    Since lazygit operates within a terminal, it might not fully integrate with other graphical development tools some users prefer, reducing its appeal for those who favor all-in-one solutions.
  • Feature Parity
    Lazygit might not support all the advanced features found in more comprehensive GUI-based git clients, potentially requiring users to fall back to command-line git for specific tasks.
  • Resource Consumption
    As a terminal-based tool, lazygit might consume more system resources compared to purely CLI-based git operations, which could be a concern for users on less powerful machines.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server videos

No Atlassian Bitbucket Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

lazygit videos

15 Lazygit Features In Under 15 Minutes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Atlassian Bitbucket Server and lazygit)
Git
37 37%
63% 63
Code Collaboration
49 49%
51% 51
Version Control
100 100%
0% 0
Git Tools
28 28%
72% 72

User comments

Share your experience with using Atlassian Bitbucket Server and lazygit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, lazygit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 100 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Atlassian Bitbucket Server yet. Tracking of Atlassian Bitbucket Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

lazygit mentions (100)

  • LazyJournal: A Terminal User Interface for Logs
    LazyJournal is a terminal user interface (TUI) written in Go, designed for easy analysis of system and application logs. It is inspired by tools like lazydocker and lazygit, providing interactive access to search, view, and filter logs from various sources in the local system. - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago
  • Switching Fully to Neovim
    Additionally, I integrate several CLI tools into my work flow, such as lazygit for streamlined Git operations, yazi as a terminal file manager, tmux for session management, and lazydocker for handling Docker containers efficiently. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • TIL: Ghostty — a new and quite promising terminal emulator
    While design is an important part to some degree, there is something more that I've become observing and, therefore, liking lately: the reasonable default configs of the apps, which mean that the majority of the users will never need to mess with configs at all. Here is a great post by Arne about this trend which lists such tools like Fish (mentioned above), Helix, Lazygit, Zellij, k9s, etc. And that a very... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Tig: Text-Mode Interface for Git
    There're multiple solutions like this and I've used some of them over the past years. - There's obviously the fantastic Magit (https://github.com/magit/magit) I did use this for a long time but recently switched over to LazyGit for the better Vim bindings and having more features - LazyGit (https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit). One thing that I added that (as far as I know) none of the others have and I... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Lazy Docker: The lazier way to manage everything Docker
    If you like lazydocker also check out lazygit by the same author: https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Atlassian Bitbucket Server and lazygit, you can also consider the following products

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Fork - Fast and Friendly Git Client for Mac

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.

CodeHub - CodeHub is the most complete, unofficial, client for GitHub on the iOS platform.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

fugitive (via vim) - Free - VIM license