Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ASP.NET Zero VS Play Framework

Compare ASP.NET Zero VS Play Framework and see what are their differences

ASP.NET Zero logo ASP.NET Zero

ASP.NET Zero makes your everyday development effort stress-free by means of a comprehensive web application structure. ASP.NET Zero Developers.

Play Framework logo Play Framework

An open source web framework which follows the model-view-controller architecture. It is light-weight, web-friendly, and stateless. It provides minimal overhead for highly-scalable applications.
  • ASP.NET Zero Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-02
  • Play Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-23

ASP.NET Zero features and specs

  • Feature-Rich Boilerplate
    ASP.NET Zero provides a rich set of pre-built features such as authentication, user management, role management, and more, which significantly accelerate development.
  • Customizability
    The framework is highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor the application to specific business needs without starting from scratch.
  • Consistent Updates
    ASP.NET Zero is regularly updated to align with the latest web development technologies and practices, ensuring that your applications are built on current standards.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    It offers detailed documentation and tutorials, which helps developers understand and implement the framework quickly and effectively.
  • Responsive Support
    The platform provides a responsive and helpful support team that assists with issues and inquiries, making it easier to solve development challenges.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET Zero

  • Cost
    ASP.NET Zero is not open-source and requires a licensing fee, which might be a barrier for small teams or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers not familiar with ASP.NET or the specific architectural patterns used, there can be a significant learning curve to effectively utilize the framework.
  • Overhead
    The abundance of features and configurations can introduce unnecessary complexity for simple projects, potentially leading to higher overhead.
  • Dependency on Specific Frameworks
    ASP.NET Zero is heavily tied to specific Microsoft technologies and frameworks, which might limit flexibility if you choose to switch tech stacks.
  • Updates and Compatibility Issues
    Frequent updates require effort from your team to keep the project in sync, potentially leading to compatibility issues with custom code over time.

Play Framework features and specs

  • Scalability
    The Play Framework is built with scalability in mind, making it easier to develop applications that can handle a large number of simultaneous users and requests.
  • Reactive Programming
    Play is based on a reactive programming model, which allows it to handle asynchronous tasks efficiently. This results in better performance and resource utilization.
  • Hot Reloading
    Play supports hot reloading, enabling developers to see changes in real-time without needing to restart the server. This feature boosts productivity by speeding up the development cycle.
  • Java and Scala Support
    The framework supports both Java and Scala, accommodating a wide range of developers and allowing teams to choose their preferred language.
  • Built-in Testing
    Play has built-in support for writing unit and functional tests, offering a comprehensive test framework to ensure code quality and reliability.
  • RESTful by Default
    Play makes it straightforward to build RESTful web services, simplifying the construction of APIs and ensuring that they adhere to REST principles.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The Play Framework boasts extensive and detailed documentation, making it easier for developers to get started and find solutions to common problems.

Possible disadvantages of Play Framework

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New developers might find Play’s reactive model and functional programming concepts challenging, especially if they are primarily experienced with traditional web frameworks.
  • Memory Usage
    Play applications can be memory-intensive, which might lead to higher hosting costs compared to lighter frameworks, especially for smaller applications.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring a Play application can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for beginners or small teams without extensive experience.
  • Limited Community Support
    Although Play has a dedicated user base, its community is smaller compared to more popular web frameworks like Spring or Django, potentially making it difficult to find solutions and community-driven resources.
  • Verbose Code
    Play applications may require a significant amount of boilerplate code, particularly when integrating with other services or libraries, leading to potentially verbose and less maintainable codebases.

ASP.NET Zero videos

ASP.NET Zero Introduction and Features

More videos:

  • Review - Build a Real-world Apps in Asp.Net Zero using Asp.Net Core & Angular

Play Framework videos

The Play Framework at LinkedIn: Productivity and Performance at Scale

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ASP.NET Zero and Play Framework)
Developer Tools
30 30%
70% 70
Web Frameworks
22 22%
78% 78
Python Web Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Development
24 24%
76% 76

User comments

Share your experience with using ASP.NET Zero and Play Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ASP.NET Zero and Play Framework

ASP.NET Zero Reviews

We have no reviews of ASP.NET Zero yet.
Be the first one to post

Play Framework Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
Play Framework brings Scala and Java into harmony, offering a backstage pass to simplistic, asynchronous web development. No song and dance, just straightforward high-octane performance.
17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
The Play Framework makes it possible to build lightweight and web-friendly Java and Scala applications for desktop and mobile. Play is a hugely popular framework, used by brands such as LinkedIn, Samsung, Walmart, The Guardian, Verizon, and many others.
Source: raygun.com
10 Best Java Frameworks You Should Know
Play is written using Scala Programming Language. It offers web and mobile application development. It follows MVC architecture. Play is compiled to Java-Bytecode, and this makes Play one of the most powerful frameworks.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Play Framework seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ASP.NET Zero mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ASP.NET Zero yet. Tracking of ASP.NET Zero recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Play Framework mentions (1)

  • Examples of CompletableFuture-based APIs / state of async in Java?
    I can see the Play framework really leans into async, and only tolerates blocking controllers. What else is out there? Source: over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ASP.NET Zero and Play Framework, you can also consider the following products

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Adonis JS - AdonisJs is a Node.js web framework with breath of fresh air and drizzle of elegant syntax on top of it

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

Flask - a microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions.