Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

ASP.NET VS WebPagetest

Compare ASP.NET VS WebPagetest and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

ASP.NET logo ASP.NET

ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

WebPagetest logo WebPagetest

Run a free website speed test from multiple locations around the globe using real browsers...
  • ASP.NET Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-29
  • WebPagetest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-05

ASP.NET features and specs

  • Performance
    ASP.NET is known for its high performance and scalability. It compiles server-side code to DLL files, which is executed on the server side, thereby speeding up the application's response time.
  • Security
    ASP.NET provides built-in security features like form authentication and Windows authentication, as well as protection against common threats such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and request forgery.
  • Rich Toolbox
    Visual Studio, the Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for ASP.NET, offers a rich toolbox with a plethora of controls, automatic deployment features, and other tools that significantly speed up development.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform framework, which means you can run your web applications on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Community and Support
    ASP.NET has a strong community and extensive documentation, making it easier to find solutions to problems and ensuring continuous improvement and support.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET

  • Learning Curve
    The framework can be complex for beginners, especially those without experience in C# or the .NET ecosystem.
  • Cost
    While ASP.NET Core is free and open-source, some advanced features and tools require a Visual Studio subscription, which can be expensive.
  • Hosting
    Although ASP.NET Core has improved in terms of cross-platform hosting, traditional ASP.NET applications are primarily optimized for Windows servers, limiting hosting options.
  • Resource Intensive
    ASP.NET applications can be more resource-intensive than applications built with some other frameworks, which can lead to higher infrastructure costs.
  • Complexity
    The framework offers a lot of features and functionalities, which can sometimes make it overly complex and harder to manage for smaller projects.

WebPagetest features and specs

  • Detailed Performance Metrics
    WebPagetest provides extensive performance metrics, including Time to First Byte (TTFB), Speed Index, and First Contentful Paint, allowing for a deep understanding of website performance.
  • Real Browsers
    Tests are conducted using real browsers, which ensures that the results are closely aligned with real user experiences.
  • Geolocation Testing
    Supports testing from various locations worldwide, which is useful for understanding performance in different markets.
  • Advanced Testing Options
    Offers advanced options such as scripting for complex interactions, multi-step transactions, and authenticating users.
  • Free and Open Source
    WebPagetest is free to use and its code is open-source, allowing for community contributions and customizable implementations.
  • Video Capture
    Provides video capture of the loading process, giving a visual representation of loading performance.
  • Waterfall Charts
    Generates detailed waterfall charts that help identify bottlenecks in resource loading.

Possible disadvantages of WebPagetest

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive options and detailed metrics may be overwhelming for beginners who are not familiar with web performance testing.
  • Intermittent Performance
    As a free service, sometimes the performance can be inconsistent due to high demand or limited resources.
  • Dated Interface
    The user interface of the website is somewhat dated and could benefit from modernization to improve user experience.
  • Limited Instant Support
    Lack of immediate support options can be a downside; users often have to rely on forums and community support.
  • Potential for Inconsistent Results
    Results might vary between tests due to variability in internet speed, server conditions, and other external factors.
  • Configuration Overhead
    Advanced testing options require a significant amount of configuration, which can be time-consuming.

ASP.NET videos

+ Add

Build Rating and Review System in ASP.NET MVC and Entity Framework

More videos:

  • Review - ASP.NET MVC - Review 0
  • Review - IMDeanyP Movie Review Site - ASP.NET / C# / SQL Server / MVC / Entity Framework

WebPagetest videos

+ Add

WebPageTest - The State of the Web

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Use WebPageTest.org - For Beginners

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ASP.NET and WebPagetest)

ASP.NET

WebPagetest

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Website Monitoring
0 0%
Website Monitoring
100% 100
Web Frameworks
100 100%
Web Frameworks
0% 0
Performance Monitoring
0 0%
Performance Monitoring
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ASP.NET and WebPagetest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ASP.NET and WebPagetest

ASP.NET Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
ASP.NET’s got that Microsoft muscle, a powerhouse of a framework for building dynamic web services and more. It lets you roll out robust websites with the smoothness that comes with deep pockets. Perfect for .NET software development teams.
Source: tms-outsource.com
Top 10 Phoenix Framework Alternatives
Moving over to the .NET platform, Asp.Net is an open-source web framework developed by Microsoft that allows developers to build dynamic web pages, apps, and services using HTML, JavaScript, and CSS.
Source: blog.back4app.com
10 Ruby on Rails Alternatives For Web Development in 2022
Last but not least, a back-end web framework created by Microsoft for the development of dynamic web pages - ASP.NET. Built on top of C# it is one the fastest frameworks available on the market. ASP.NET is capable of handling 7.01 million requests per second while Django handles only 79,266 requests. The framework is mainly used for building web applications, APIs,...
Source: www.ideamotive.co

WebPagetest Reviews

We have no reviews of WebPagetest yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WebPagetest should be more popular than ASP.NET. It has been mentiond 51 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ASP.NET mentions (22)

  • 30,656 Pages of Books About the .NET Ecosystem: C#, Blazor, ASP.NET, & T-SQL
    Most of the books teach C# and .NET, ASP.NET, Blazor, or T-SQL. I also found some .NET-specific coverage of wider topics: architecture and design, concurrency, automated tests, functional programming, and dependency injection. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Diversify Your Tech Stack: Uncovering Powerful Node js Alternatives
    Built by Microsoft, .NET is a high-performance application platform that uses C# for programming. .NET is cross-platform and comes with plenty of libraries and APIs covering collections, networking, and machine learning to build different types of applications. ASP.NET Core widens the .NET developer platform with libraries and tools geared towards web applications. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • C# Fundamentals
    Web Applications: ASP.NET, a powerful framework for building web applications, is primarily based on C#. Developers can create dynamic websites, web APIs, and services with ASP.NET. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • What’s New in Bold Reports 6.1 April 2024 Release
    The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Is ASP.NET Core the next step in my career being an ASP.NET MVC developer? Or are there other technologies I should look at?
    Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

WebPagetest mentions (51)

  • A PageSpeed insight report, but for every page in your domain
    Trust neither. The most optimal option I've found is webpagetest.org Its been quite handy lately. This tool does look interesting. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How are you all accurately checking your website load time? Not sure PageSpeedInsights is very helpful.
    Webpagetest.org is another. Pagespeedinsights and lighthouse are great for identifying page load issues to fix, but actual page load times will always vary between the user and your web server. Universal analytics has some page load timings but that's going away soon and nothing afaik is in GA4. I've seen an example of building a page load timer in tag manager and dumping the results into an event. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Extreme confusing over Speed Index results -- webpagetest.org
    So I am working on rebuilding our company's site with a new stack. I am running tests using webpagetest.org, and I am having trouble fully understanding the speed index results as well as the film strip view. The page renders quite fast everywhere I test it. Google Lighthouse shows it in the 90s + for performance score, however when I test the page on webpagetest, I get load times of 77 seconds (NOT MS) which is... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Does anyone else experience pure ecstasy when they get 100 on Lighthouse? 😩
    Webpagetest.org is great, and checking OP's site they have done an incredible job, I don't think I have ever made or seen an Ecom site this slick. Super clean waterfall view. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Performance scores for Google Lighthouse/Insights seem to be very inaccurate
    Thanks for the recommendation regarding webpagetest.org, another user made a similar recommendation so I will check it out. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ASP.NET and WebPagetest, you can also consider the following products

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

GTmetrix - GTmetrix is a free tool that analyzes your page's speed performance. Using PageSpeed and YSlow, GTmetrix generates scores for your pages and offers actionable recommendations on how to fix them.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

PageSpeed Insights - PageSpeed is addon for ...

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

Google Lighthouse - Lighthouse is an open-source, automated tool for improving the quality of web pages.

Loading...