ASP.NET VS UseGravity.App

ASP.NET Reviews

UseGravity.App Reviews

ASP.NET mentions (19)

• What’s New in Bold Reports 6.1 April 2024 Release

  The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago

• Is ASP.NET Core the next step in my career being an ASP.NET MVC developer? Or are there other technologies I should look at?

  Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: about 1 year ago

• Mixing GCloud and F#

  Cloud functions run aspnet core under the hood, but since it is a controlled environment it was designed in a way that the only concern you should worry about is running your function so all of the usual boilerplate related to adding services, middleware or enabling features is hidden away from you which for most simple scenarios this is what you will need and in the case of F# where dependency injection is more... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Professional transition from Java to C#?

  I'm doing "backend data processing microservices" and the main framework component is ASP. Source: over 1 year ago

• Mudblazor for Blazor

  .NET has had various templating frameworks since its inception in the early 2000's. From the likes of Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), Windows Forms(WF), ASP.NET Core MVC, Razor Pages to Blazor and now .NET MAUI. Microsoft offers a way to choose an ASP.NET Core web UI for developers to find the right user interface(UI) to use for their solution. The focus however is on Blazor and in particular for webAssembly. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

UseGravity.App mentions (28)

• Show HN: I made a Node.js boilerplate, to ship your startup with less pain

  What is your main advantage over https://usegravity.app/? - Source: Hacker News / 1 day ago

• SaaS Forward – Fast Forward Your Development, Ship Products, and Skip Headaches

  Is this a monorepo setup? It looks like one from the graphics. I also think when it comes to these SaaS starter kits its helpful to have visuals of the out of the box look and feel. I would also recommend creating a docs page. For example I've used this a few times https://usegravity.app/ and the thing that sold me on it is the Docs, it gives the feeling that its very robust. - Source: Hacker News / 16 days ago

• Looking for Gravity SaaS boilerplate review !

  Does anyone have experience using the Gravity SaaS boilerplate (https://usegravity.app/) ? Our team is currently evaluating it for an internal expansion project, and we want to assess its entire code base before making the actual purchase. Source: about 1 year ago

• KickSaas - Yet another SaaS boilerplate. But hear me out!

  Your landing page, messaging, plans and pricing looks like a mix-match of content lifted from other SaaS boilerplates on the market including mine (https://usegravity.app). Source: over 1 year ago

• Would you buy an AWS SaaS API starter?

  If this helps, there's a similar service called https://usegravity.app . It's a full-blown starter Node/React starter kit. It starts at $800, or $900, with integrated billing. It seems like a high price and a successful product (earning over $25k per month). I found out about it when the founder did a Podcast https://indiebites.com/72. He also has a community around it, which I think is the main USP. Source: over 1 year ago