ASP.NET might be a bit more popular than Semantic UI. We know about 22 links to it since March 2021 and only 19 links to Semantic UI. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Most of the books teach C# and .NET, ASP.NET, Blazor, or T-SQL. I also found some .NET-specific coverage of wider topics: architecture and design, concurrency, automated tests, functional programming, and dependency injection. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Built by Microsoft, .NET is a high-performance application platform that uses C# for programming. .NET is cross-platform and comes with plenty of libraries and APIs covering collections, networking, and machine learning to build different types of applications. ASP.NET Core widens the .NET developer platform with libraries and tools geared towards web applications. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
Web Applications: ASP.NET, a powerful framework for building web applications, is primarily based on C#. Developers can create dynamic websites, web APIs, and services with ASP.NET. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: about 2 years ago
Semantic UI: A fully semantic front-end development framework. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Semantic UI[1] was one I used to use, both the plain CSS one as well as the React version of the library. Version 3.0 is coming (eventually), which has left it a bit outdated for a while, but it's still a solid UI library imho. I have been switching away to Tailwind. [1]: https://semantic-ui.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
What stack are you using? I personally recommend utilizing readily available components: https://ui.shadcn.com/ https://mui.com/ https://semantic-ui.com/ etc.. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Are you cool with JS frameworks? If so, you can use a higher level of abstraction that takes care of the CSS for you. If you just want to mock something up, you can use a pre-built UI system / component framework and just put together UIs declaratively, without having to worry about the underlying CSS or HTML at all. Examples include https://mui.com/ and https://chakra-ui.com/ and https://ant.design/ Really easy... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Honestly you should build a webpage and use a UI library if you want markdown with some extra pop. Check out semantic ui. Source: over 2 years ago
Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...
Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design
Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans
UIKit - A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces