Based on our record, Loopback by RogueAmoeba should be more popular than ASP.NET. It has been mentiond 126 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: about 1 year ago
Cloud functions run aspnet core under the hood, but since it is a controlled environment it was designed in a way that the only concern you should worry about is running your function so all of the usual boilerplate related to adding services, middleware or enabling features is hidden away from you which for most simple scenarios this is what you will need and in the case of F# where dependency injection is more... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I'm doing "backend data processing microservices" and the main framework component is ASP. Source: over 1 year ago
.NET has had various templating frameworks since its inception in the early 2000's. From the likes of Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), Windows Forms(WF), ASP.NET Core MVC, Razor Pages to Blazor and now .NET MAUI. Microsoft offers a way to choose an ASP.NET Core web UI for developers to find the right user interface(UI) to use for their solution. The focus however is on Blazor and in particular for webAssembly. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
No, it's very easy: https://existential.audio/blackhole/ Blackhole is Free and Open Source. Also, Rogue Amoeba has a product called "Loopback". It's not cheap, but it's another alternative: https://rogueamoeba.com/loopback/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
This is the basic idea, but there are other apps which can make it easier. I prefer using Audio Hijack for the EQ part and sending it to a pass-through device set up in Loopback (which, for this use case, functions the same as BlackHole). Source: 7 months ago
- Loopback 2 by Rogue Ameba to create a pass-thru from the soundboard (Farrago, also by Rogue Ameba) to Skype so everyone can hear me talking in addition to the soundboard on the same line. Source: 10 months ago
At the risk of further complicating matters, you could try combining sources or otherwise experimenting with Loopback, an app that's designed to do all kinds of audio routing stuff. Source: 11 months ago
You'll need an app that can make "virtual audio cables" to route sound between apps. On Mac, I used to use Soundflower but I think LoopBack is what the cool kids use now: https://rogueamoeba.com/loopback/. Source: 11 months ago
Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...
Virtual Audio Cable - Ever wanted to record your speaker output? (loopback) This is for you.
Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
Audio Hijack - Record any audio, with Audio Hijack!
Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans
JACK Audio Connection Kit - JACK Audio Connection Kit|Home