ASP.NET Reviews

CleanTalk Reviews

ASP.NET mentions (19)

• What’s New in Bold Reports 6.1 April 2024 Release

  The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago

• Is ASP.NET Core the next step in my career being an ASP.NET MVC developer? Or are there other technologies I should look at?

  Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: over 1 year ago

• Mixing GCloud and F#

  Cloud functions run aspnet core under the hood, but since it is a controlled environment it was designed in a way that the only concern you should worry about is running your function so all of the usual boilerplate related to adding services, middleware or enabling features is hidden away from you which for most simple scenarios this is what you will need and in the case of F# where dependency injection is more... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Professional transition from Java to C#?

  I'm doing "backend data processing microservices" and the main framework component is ASP. Source: over 1 year ago

• Mudblazor for Blazor

  .NET has had various templating frameworks since its inception in the early 2000's. From the likes of Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), Windows Forms(WF), ASP.NET Core MVC, Razor Pages to Blazor and now .NET MAUI. Microsoft offers a way to choose an ASP.NET Core web UI for developers to find the right user interface(UI) to use for their solution. The focus however is on Blazor and in particular for webAssembly. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

CleanTalk mentions (6)

• Fake Requests

  Https://cleantalk.org/ it's $8 a year well worth it. Stop spam form entries on all my client sites. Source: over 2 years ago

• Spam user registration

  ReCaptcha doesn't work well any more, and AntiSpam Bee seems to be letting more spam through as well lately. I've switched a few clients over to Cleantalk and it's quite solid. Source: over 2 years ago

• CleanTalk

  CleanTalk is awesome service for Spam protection, AntiSpam, FireWall by CleanTalk. CleanTalk Anti-Spam is a cloud service protection from spam for websites. I used it in my website and it was excellent for that reason I recommend.CleanTalk. Source: over 2 years ago

• Should I use a captcha plug in to get rid of spam comments?

  CleanTalk is a great plugin that's only about $12 per year, and I've read some people on this sub say that they use it along with Antispam Bee, which is free. It uses Clean Talk's servers to do all the spam detection, so it won't slow down your site. It's what I use, but I haven't published my site yet so I can't give you a personal account of how well it works. With that said, I've seen it ranked highly in a... Source: over 2 years ago

• reCaptcha - is anything going to work better

  IMHO...I have found CleanTalk to be most effective approach to the issue of antispam. Source: over 2 years ago