Artistic Style VS Prettier

Default Artistic Style (astyle), https://astyle.sourceforge.net/ , is a pretty good one. Big thing for me is always "default", because it also means there is no need to configure every new environment. Source: about 1 year ago

Check out artistic style, which gives you pretty granular control over how everything is formatted. I don’t know if it’ll do exactly what you want, but in my experience it’s been a reliable formatting tool. Source: about 3 years ago

In this post, I also use ESLint + Standard JS as my code formatting tools. Formatting JS/TS code by using ESLint is also subjective and opinionated, arguably most people would rather use Prettier instead, which provides more configurable options. - Source: dev.to / about 21 hours ago

Automating code checks with static code analysis allows us to enforce code styling effectively. By integrating tools into our workflow, we can identify errors at an early stage, while coding instead of blocking us at the end. For instance, flake8 checks Python code for style and errors, eslint performs similar checks for JavaScript, and prettier automatically formats code to maintain consistency. - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago

So anyways, I wanted to hook up Emacs with Astro support. For now, I've just been roughing it out there and running Prettier by itself and turning off save on format and auto-complete. It's been scary. - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago

If you're a developer, you're surely familiar with Prettier and ESLint. With over 8 years of existence, they have established themselves as references in the JavaScript ecosystem. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago

No formatting inconsistencies: The committed code should follow the organization's code formatting standards(prettier or pretty-quick). - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago