Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apple Machine Learning Journal VS The State of JavaScript 2018

Compare Apple Machine Learning Journal VS The State of JavaScript 2018 and see what are their differences

Apple Machine Learning Journal logo Apple Machine Learning Journal

A blog written by Apple engineers

The State of JavaScript 2018 logo The State of JavaScript 2018

Discover the latest trends in the JavaScript ecosystem
  • Apple Machine Learning Journal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-13
  • The State of JavaScript 2018 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-10

Apple Machine Learning Journal features and specs

  • Expert Insight
    The journal provides in-depth insights from Apple's own machine learning experts, offering unique and valuable perspectives on the latest research and applications in the field.
  • Practical Applications
    The content often focuses on real-world applications and implementations of machine learning within Apple's ecosystem, making it highly relevant for practitioners.
  • High-Quality Content
    The articles in the journal are meticulously reviewed and curated, ensuring high-quality and reliable information.
  • Cutting-Edge Research
    Readers get early access to cutting-edge research and innovations directly from Apple's R&D teams.
  • Free Access
    The journal is freely accessible to the public, removing barriers for anyone interested in learning from industry leaders.

Possible disadvantages of Apple Machine Learning Journal

  • Apple-Centric
    The focus is predominantly on Apple's ecosystem, which may limit the applicability of some insights and solutions for those working with other platforms.
  • Infrequent Updates
    The journal does not publish new content as frequently as some other machine learning blogs or journals, potentially limiting its usefulness for staying up-to-date with the latest in the field.
  • Technical Depth
    While the technical rigor is generally high, this can make the content less accessible to beginners or those without a strong background in machine learning.
  • Limited Interactivity
    The journal primarily provides static articles and lacks interactive elements or community features such as forums or comment sections for reader engagement.
  • Bias Towards Proprietary Solutions
    The solutions and approaches advocated often align closely with Apple's proprietary technologies, which may not always be applicable or optimal for all contexts and use cases.

The State of JavaScript 2018 features and specs

  • Comprehensive Data
    The survey offers a wide range of data on JavaScript libraries, frameworks, and tools, providing a broad overview of the ecosystem in 2018.
  • Community Insights
    It offers insights directly from JavaScript developers, reflecting trends, preferences, and challenges faced by the community.
  • Historical Reference
    Serves as a historical reference point to track the evolution and adoption of different technologies in the JavaScript world over the years.
  • Visual Presentation
    Includes charts and graphs that make the information easy to digest and understand trends quickly.
  • Segmented Analysis
    Provides segmented analysis of different aspects of JavaScript such as frameworks, testing, state management, etc., for more targeted insights.

Possible disadvantages of The State of JavaScript 2018

  • Potential Bias
    The survey could be subject to self-selection bias, as it depends on who chooses to participate.
  • Time-Sensitive Data
    Being from 2018, the survey data is outdated, and the JavaScript ecosystem evolves rapidly, possibly limiting its current relevance.
  • Limited Demographics
    May not accurately represent all JavaScript developers globally, particularly those from underrepresented regions or communities.
  • Depth vs. Breadth
    While comprehensive, some areas may lack depth in insights compared to focused, specialized surveys or studies.
  • Interpretation Challenges
    The results and trends can be challenging to interpret without considering external factors influencing the JavaScript ecosystem.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apple Machine Learning Journal and The State of JavaScript 2018)
AI
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
70 70%
30% 30
Tech
47 47%
53% 53
Data Science And Machine Learning

User comments

Share your experience with using Apple Machine Learning Journal and The State of JavaScript 2018. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apple Machine Learning Journal seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apple Machine Learning Journal mentions (7)

  • Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models
    Https://machinelearning.apple.com Fun fact: Their first paper, Improving the Realism of Synthetic Images (2017; https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/gan), strongly hints at eye and hand tracking for the Apple Vision Pro released 5 years later. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Does anyone else suspect that the official iOS ChatGPT app might be conducting some local inference / edge-computing? [Discussion]
    For your reference, Apple's pages for Machine Learning for Developers and for their research. The Apple Neural Engine was custom designed to work better with their proprietary machine learning programs -- and they've been opening up access to developers by extending support / compatibility for TensorFlow and PyTorch. They've also got CoreML, CreateML, and various APIs they are making to allow more use of their... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Which papers should I implement or which Projects should I do to get an entry level job as a Computer vision engineer at MAANG ?
    We even host annual poster sessions of those PhD intern’s work while at our company, and it’ll give you an idea of the caliber of work. It may not be as great as Nvidia, Stryker, Waymo, or Tesla (which are not part of MAANG but I believe are far more ahead in CV), but it’s worth of considering. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Apple’s secrecy created engineer burnout
    They have something for ML: https://machinelearning.apple.com. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • [D] Is anyone working on open-sourcing Dall-E 2?
    They're more subtle about it, I think. https://machinelearning.apple.com/ Some of the papers are pretty good. I don't disagree with your sentiment in aggregate, though. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

The State of JavaScript 2018 mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of The State of JavaScript 2018 yet. Tracking of The State of JavaScript 2018 recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apple Machine Learning Journal and The State of JavaScript 2018, you can also consider the following products

Amazon Machine Learning - Machine learning made easy for developers of any skill level

JavaScript.com - A free resource for learning and developing in JavaScript

Machine Learning Playground - Breathtaking visuals for learning ML techniques.

BundlePhobia - Find the performance impact of adding a npm package to your bundle.

Lobe - Visual tool for building custom deep learning models

JavaScript Operator Lookup - A full list of JavaScript operators with examples