Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
ACM

Apple Core ML VS BrowserStack

Compare Apple Core ML VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apple Core ML logo Apple Core ML

Integrate a broad variety of ML model types into your app

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • Apple Core ML Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

Apple Core ML

Website
developer.apple.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

BrowserStack

Website
browserstack.com
Pricing URL
Official BrowserStack Pricing
$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999
Edit details

Apple Core ML features and specs

  • Integration with Apple Ecosystem
    Core ML is tightly integrated with Apple's hardware and software environments, providing seamless performance and ensuring that models work well across iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS devices.
  • Performance Optimization
    Core ML is optimized for on-device performance, leveraging the capabilities of Apple’s processors to deliver fast and efficient machine learning tasks without significant battery drain or latency.
  • Privacy
    With on-device processing, Core ML allows for data privacy as it minimizes the need for sending user data to external servers, which aligns with Apple's strong privacy principles.
  • Ease of Use
    Developers can easily integrate machine learning models into their applications using Core ML, thanks to its extensive support for various model types and the availability of conversion tools from popular ML frameworks.
  • Continuous Updates
    Apple regularly updates Core ML to include the latest advancements and optimizations in machine learning, ensuring developers have access to cutting-edge tools.

Possible disadvantages of Apple Core ML

  • Platform Limitation
    Core ML is designed specifically for Apple devices, which limits its use to only Apple's ecosystem and may not be suitable for applications targeting multiple platforms.
  • Model Size Restrictions
    There are limitations on the size of models that can be deployed on-device, which can be a hindrance for applications requiring large and complex models.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are new to iOS or macOS development, there might be a learning curve to effectively integrate and utilize Core ML features within their applications.
  • Limited Framework Support
    While Core ML supports popular machine learning frameworks, not all frameworks and their full functionalities are supported, which can be restrictive for developers using niche or emerging frameworks.
  • Hardware Dependency
    The performance and capabilities of machine learning models in Core ML heavily depend on the specific hardware of the Apple device being used, which can lead to inconsistent performance across different devices.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

Analysis of BrowserStack

Overall verdict

  • Overall, BrowserStack is considered a highly effective and reliable tool in the web development and testing community. Its extensive features, real-device testing capabilities, and seamless integration make it a good choice for those needing comprehensive cross-browser testing solutions.

Why this product is good

  • BrowserStack is a robust and widely used web testing platform that provides developers with the ability to test their websites and applications across a vast array of browsers and devices. It offers real device cloud testing, ensuring that users can assess how their applications perform on actual devices rather than simulations. This makes it an invaluable tool for identifying and resolving cross-browser compatibility issues. Additionally, it integrates with popular CI/CD tools, enhancing the workflow efficiency for development teams.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • QA engineers
  • Agile development teams
  • Companies needing cross-browser testing across multiple devices
  • Teams looking for CI/CD integration in their testing process

Apple Core ML videos

+ Add

IBM Watson & Apple Core ML Collaboration - What it means for app development

BrowserStack videos

+ Add

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apple Core ML and BrowserStack)

Apple Core ML

BrowserStack

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100
AI
100 100%
AI
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apple Core ML and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apple Core ML and BrowserStack

Apple Core ML Reviews

We have no reviews of Apple Core ML yet.
Be the first one to post

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

BrowserStack might be a bit more popular than Apple Core ML. We know about 8 links to it since March 2021 and only 7 links to Apple Core ML. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apple Core ML mentions (7)

  • Ask HN: Where is Apple? They seem to be left out of the AI race?
    On the machine learning side of AI, they have CoreML. You can drag-and-drop images into Xcode to train an image classifier. And run the models on device, so if solar flares destroy the cell phone network and terrorists bomb all the data centers, your phone could still tell you if it's a hot dog or not. https://developer.apple.com/machine-learning/ https://developer.apple.com/machine-learning/core-ml/... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • The Magnitude of the AI Bubble
    Apple has actually created ML chipsets, so AI can be executed natively, on-device. https://developer.apple.com/machine-learning/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Does anyone else suspect that the official iOS ChatGPT app might be conducting some local inference / edge-computing? [Discussion]
    For your reference, Apple's pages for Machine Learning for Developers and for their research. The Apple Neural Engine was custom designed to work better with their proprietary machine learning programs -- and they've been opening up access to developers by extending support / compatibility for TensorFlow and PyTorch. They've also got CoreML, CreateML, and various APIs they are making to allow more use of their... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Apple to occupy 90% of TSMC 3nm capacity in 2023
    > It’d be one thing if Apple actually worked on AI softwares a bit and made it readily available to developers. * Apple Silicon CPUs have a Neural Engine specifically made for fast ML-inference * Apple supports PyTorch (https://developer.apple.com/metal/pytorch/) * Apple has its own easily accessible machine-learning framework called Core-ML (https://developer.apple.com/machine-learning/) So it would be inaccurate... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • The iPhone 13 is a pitch-perfect iPhone 12S
    This is the developer documentation where they advertise the APIs - https://developer.apple.com/machine-learning/. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

BrowserStack mentions (8)

  • Show HN: Quell – AI QA Agent Working Across Linear, Vercel, Jira, Netlify, Figma
    This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / 16 days ago
  • 🛑 Stop resizing your browser: improve testing for responsiveness
    Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Unsupported country
    If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Windows vs Mac?
    For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?
    I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apple Core ML and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

Amazon Machine Learning - Machine learning made easy for developers of any skill level

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

TensorFlow Lite - Low-latency inference of on-device ML models

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

ML5.js - Friendly machine learning for the web

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Loading...