Software Alternatives & Reviews

AppImageKit VS Chef Habitat

Compare AppImageKit VS Chef Habitat and see what are their differences

AppImageKit logo AppImageKit

Linux apps that run anywhere

Chef Habitat logo Chef Habitat

Chef Habitat - Automation that travels with the app. Chef Habitat allows any app to be independent of any particular infrastructure environment, like containers or PaaS.
  • AppImageKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18
  • Chef Habitat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30

AppImageKit videos

No AppImageKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Chef Habitat videos

ChefConf 2019: A Guided Tour of Chef Habitat Builder and Depot

More videos:

  • Review - dotNET Dev Show: Beyond the Basics with Chef Habitat

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AppImageKit and Chef Habitat)
Front End Package Manager
Developer Tools
80 80%
20% 20
Containers As A Service
0 0%
100% 100
Software Marketplace
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using AppImageKit and Chef Habitat. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppImageKit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 52 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AppImageKit mentions (52)

  • GoboLinux
    What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since I prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Bitwarden Heist – How to Break into Password Vaults Without Using Passwords
    Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years. [0] https://appimage.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's the best CLI installation experience you've ever seen?
    There is AppImage[1], which packs a lot of stuff into a SquashFS filesystem, appends it to the executable, so everything is in one file. [1] https://appimage.org. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Linux users when their preferred app isn't packaged in the main repository
    Nah I think yall just hating appimage. Real gold standard. Source: 10 months ago
  • How to minimize RAM usage during Go binary compilation
    Although I haven't used plugins feature myself yet, this does sound like the perfect use case for them. Not every patient needs to access every single source. With plugins you can load only the source (or few sources) that they actually need. You can still use something like https://appimage.org/ to give them "a single binary", but will actually contain your slim binary and all the plugins. Source: 10 months ago
View more

Chef Habitat mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Chef Habitat yet. Tracking of Chef Habitat recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AppImageKit and Chef Habitat, you can also consider the following products

Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here

Kublr - Kublr offers enterprise-grade secure, scalable, highly reliable Kubernetes clusters on AWS, Azure...

Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service