Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Appian VS WebRTC

Compare Appian VS WebRTC and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Appian logo Appian

See how Appian, leading provider of modern low-code and BPM software solutions, has helped transform the businesses of over 3.5 million users worldwide.

WebRTC logo WebRTC

WebRTC is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose.
  • Appian Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-20
  • WebRTC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-19

Appian features and specs

  • Low-Code Development
    Appian allows users to create applications with minimal hand-coding, catering to business analysts and developers alike. Its drag-and-drop interface simplifies development and accelerates time-to-market.
  • Process Automation
    Appian excels in automating complex business processes, improving operational efficiency, and reducing human error. Its powerful BPM tools streamline workflows effectively.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Appian provides strong integration capabilities with various third-party systems, databases, and cloud services. This ensures that applications can seamlessly communicate with existing enterprise systems.
  • Enterprise-Grade Security
    Appian offers robust security features, including role-based access control and data encryption, making it suitable for businesses with stringent security requirements.
  • Scalability
    As a cloud-native platform, Appian is highly scalable, supporting the needs of growing enterprises by easily handling increased loads and more complex applications.
  • User Experience
    The platform provides a user-friendly interface, both for developers building the applications and end-users interacting with them, enhancing overall user satisfaction.

Possible disadvantages of Appian

  • Cost
    Appian can be expensive, particularly for small to medium-sized businesses. Its pricing model might not be feasible for organizations operating on a limited budget.
  • Learning Curve
    Although it simplifies development, mastering Appian still requires a learning curve. Users need to invest time in training, which can slow down the initial development phase.
  • Complex Customization
    Highly tailored or very specific customizations can be challenging to implement within Appian. Some complicated functionalities may require extensive workarounds.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Appian's offline capabilities are limited, which can be a disadvantage for field services or users who need to access the application without a reliable internet connection.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Due to its proprietary technology, organizations may face vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate applications or data to another platform if needed.
  • Performance Issues at Scale
    While Appian is scalable, some users report performance issues when running extremely large and complex applications, which can impact user experience and overall efficiency.

WebRTC features and specs

  • Real-time Communication
    WebRTC enables real-time voice, video, and data communication directly between web browsers and other devices without requiring plugins or additional frameworks.
  • Open Source
    WebRTC is free and open-source, which allows developers to inspect, modify, and enhance the code to suit their needs without incurring licensing costs.
  • Peer-to-Peer Architecture
    The peer-to-peer architecture of WebRTC reduces latency and can be more efficient than server-based architectures for real-time communication, saving bandwidth and server resources.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    WebRTC operates seamlessly across different platforms (web, mobile, desktop) and operating systems, ensuring broad accessibility and reach.
  • Built-in Security
    WebRTC comes with built-in security features such as encryption of data streams (SRTP) and secure access to media devices, which enhances user privacy and data security.

Possible disadvantages of WebRTC

  • Network Traversal Issues
    WebRTC can face challenges with firewall and NAT traversal, which might require additional setup and infrastructure like TURN servers to relay traffic.
  • Browser Compatibility
    While most modern browsers support WebRTC, there may still be inconsistencies or issues with certain browsers or versions, necessitating thorough compatibility testing.
  • Scalability Challenges
    Handling large-scale implementations or group calls can be challenging with WebRTC's peer-to-peer architecture, often requiring additional signaling servers and infrastructure.
  • Lack of Quality Control
    WebRTC doesn’t have built-in mechanisms for monitoring and controlling the quality of service (QoS), which can lead to variations in audio and video quality especially under poor network conditions.
  • Complexity of Implementation
    Building a complete WebRTC-based application can be complex due to the need for handling signaling, session management, and potential browser-specific issues.

Analysis of WebRTC

Overall verdict

  • WebRTC is generally considered a good solution for real-time communication needs due to its robust features, ease of integration, and strong support from a wide array of browsers and platforms. Its open-source nature also encourages continuous improvements and community support, making it a reliable choice for developers.

Why this product is good

  • WebRTC is a powerful open-source project that facilitates real-time communication directly between web browsers and mobile apps. It enables high-quality audio, video, and data transfer, leveraging technologies like peer-to-peer connections without requiring plugins or external software. This makes WebRTC a versatile and efficient option for developers looking to implement seamless real-time communication capabilities in their applications.

Recommended for

  • Video conferencing applications
  • Online gaming with live interactions
  • Collaborative tools and platforms
  • Educational software with live communication features
  • Peer-to-peer file sharing

Appian videos

Appian CEO: Delivering ‘Mission-Critical’ Software | Mad Money | CNBC

More videos:

  • Review - This is Appian
  • Review - Appian Application Designer: Build Applications in Days, not Years

WebRTC videos

Google WebRTC project update & Stadia review

More videos:

  • Tutorial - WebRTC Tutorial - How does WebRTC work?
  • Demo - Use Case - WebRTC Bill Review Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Appian and WebRTC)
BPM
100 100%
0% 0
Communication
0 0%
100% 100
Workflow Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Group Chat & Notifications

User comments

Share your experience with using Appian and WebRTC. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Appian and WebRTC

Appian Reviews

Top 10 Microsoft Power Apps Alternatives and Competitors 2024
Strengths: A powerful low-code platform, Appian caters to large enterprises with complex business process automation needs. It offers robust workflow management capabilities, allowing you to automate intricate business processes with decision-making logic and case management features. Appian excels in industries like finance, insurance, and healthcare, where complex...
Source: medium.com
7 Best Business Process Management Tools (2023)
Appian is used by companies to automate their routine tasks, integrate with other enterprise tools, and create custom workflows. It offers a wide range of features such as mobile app development, chatbots, AI assistants, etc.
11 Business Process Management (BPM) Software for SMBs
Experience the power of business workflow automation with Appian and accelerate your business governance, results, and efficiency. Appian simplifies your workflow design to empower users and pro developers to draw processes, such as a flowchart.
Source: geekflare.com
10 Best Low-Code Development Platforms in 2020
Verdict: Appian is the provider of the software development platform. The Appian low code development platform is a combination of intelligent automation and low-code development.
Best Google App Maker alternatives in 2020
Appian excels when used to create form-based apps. The product does allow building custom UI components, but only by using Appian’s in-product customization tools. Appian’s reasoning for this is security and to ensure JS compliance across browsers and devices.
Source: retool.com

WebRTC Reviews

SignalR Alternatives
SignalR is basically used to allow connection between client and server or vice-versa. It is a type of bi-directional communication between both the client and server. SignalR is compatible with web sockets and many other connections, which help in the direct push of content over the server. There are many alternatives for signalR that are used, like Firebase, pusher,...
Source: www.educba.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WebRTC should be more popular than Appian. It has been mentiond 49 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Appian mentions (5)

  • Low-Code tools & Frontend
    Does any of you use a low-code tool like Retool or Appian? If so, what is the most common use case? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Appian Associate Developer Certification help
    Look for use case inspiration in the Solutions area of appian.com and within the AppMarket. See if you can build proof of concepts of some of these. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What is best way to create an online responsive database driven website to help manage my small orchard?
    There are low code database driven website creation systems out there at the moment e.g. OutSystems and Appian however they have very limited free trials (e.g. auto-disable after a few days of no use), and then the paid options are again too expensive. Although I will note that they seem to be great in terms of their usability and would be perfect for creating a simple interface without too much diving into code. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Software Engineer role - Transferable or Pigeon-holed?
    My concern however is - the working software isn't a generic language such as Java, C#/C++, Python etc. - it is with Appian (Business Process Management), which is a rather specific low-code platform for developing workflow and automation solutions. The role does have other elements potentially too such as getting hands on cloud and API dev etc. The pay for Appian Developers currently is GREAT due to high demand -... Source: about 3 years ago
  • What is low code?
    Platforms like UiPath, Workato, and Appian provide ways to integrate apps and automate the processes that connect and flow between them. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

WebRTC mentions (49)

  • SSE, WebSockets, or Polling? Build a Real-Time Stock App with React and Hono
    For real-time communication used mostly for video and voice calls, check out WebRTC. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • 17 Reasons Why JavaScript is Essential for Real-Time Applications
    One of the most visible aspects of JavaScript for interactive web applications is its ability to make user interactions feel seamless and instantaneous. For example, form validation, auto-suggestions, and real-time data visualization are all powered by JavaScript, allowing users to engage with web apps more fluidly. These instant interactions reduce frustration and keep users engaged. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Mastering Real-Time Collaboration: Building Figma and Miro-Inspired Features with Supabase
    So before we dive into the implementation, I would like to share a few things about this project(my personal exp.). During this project I studying a ton about webRTC. I started studying webRTC from scratch, like what is webRTC? How is the connection formed? How the data transfer takes place. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Show HN: I built a website to share files and messages without any server
    WebRTC it is: https://webrtc.org/ Yes only the network layer encryption. No file encryption as it will cost client browsers a lot in case of encrypting and then decrypting that at other end. I have written more about it here: https://dikshantraj2001.medium.com/nat-stun-turn-and-ice-466dabbc2fdb Currently, I am using the public STUN servers only. If the IPs are not reachable, it would show an error and won't work... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • WebSocket vs. HTTP communication protocols
    You might also consider assessing complementary or alternative technologies; WebSocket and HTTP aren’t the only options when it comes to real-time communication, after all. WebRTC is similar to WebSocket, with the key difference being that it’s used to implement peer-to-peer connections without relying on a server. That can be especially helpful for video calls, allowing participants to communicate directly... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Appian and WebRTC, you can also consider the following products

Camunda - The Universal Process Orchestrator

Zoom - Equip your team with tools designed to collaborate, connect, and engage with teammates and customers, no matter where you’re located, all in one platform.

Kintone - Build business apps and supercharge your company's productivity with kintone's all-in-one...

WebEx - Cisco WebEx Web Conferencing, Online Meetings, Desktop Sharing, Video Conferencing

Scoop Solar - Scoop Solar is a comprehensive mobile business process management tool for growing solar companies.

ClickMeeting - Collaborate with partners and clients using ClickMeeting professional web conferencing software. Try it now, FREE!