Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AppGyver Composer VS Materialize CSS

Compare AppGyver Composer VS Materialize CSS and see what are their differences

AppGyver Composer logo AppGyver Composer

Visual enterprise-grade low code mobile app builder

Materialize CSS logo Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design
  • AppGyver Composer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-18
  • Materialize CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-14

AppGyver Composer

$ Details
-
Release Date
2010 January
Startup details
Country
Finland
City
Helsinki
Founder(s)
Henri Vahakainu
Employees
10 - 19

AppGyver Composer features and specs

  • No-code Development
    AppGyver Composer allows users to create applications without any coding knowledge, making it accessible to a broader audience.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The platform supports the creation of web, iOS, and Android applications, enabling broader reach and usability.
  • Extensive Component Library
    Users have access to a wide range of pre-built components and templates, reducing development time and effort.
  • Integration Capabilities
    AppGyver integrates with various APIs and services, allowing for a seamless connection to external data sources and functionalities.
  • Real-time Preview
    Users can see real-time previews of their applications as they build them, facilitating quicker iterations and refinements.
  • Good Documentation and Community Support
    The platform offers robust documentation and has an active community, which can be invaluable for troubleshooting and learning.
  • Free Tier
    AppGyver provides a free tier, making it an economical choice for startups and small projects.

Possible disadvantages of AppGyver Composer

  • Learning Curve
    Despite being a no-code platform, it still requires learning how to use the interface and features effectively, which can be time-consuming for beginners.
  • Performance Limitations
    Applications built on no-code platforms like AppGyver may have performance limitations compared to custom-coded apps.
  • Customization Constraints
    Advanced customization options might be limited, impacting the ability to implement highly specialized features.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Relying on a third-party platform for app development could pose risks if the service changes its terms or discontinues support.
  • Complex Integrations
    While integration is possible, some complex integrations might be challenging to execute without coding knowledge.
  • Scalability Issues
    As applications grow in complexity, scalability might become an issue, necessitating a switch to more robust development solutions.

Materialize CSS features and specs

  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages of Materialize CSS

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.

AppGyver Composer videos

Todo app with AppGyver Composer

More videos:

  • Review - AppGyver Composer Pro overview

Materialize CSS videos

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AppGyver Composer and Materialize CSS)
Developer Tools
16 16%
84% 84
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Development Tools
39 39%
61% 61
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using AppGyver Composer and Materialize CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AppGyver Composer and Materialize CSS

AppGyver Composer Reviews

Android Studio Alternative
AppGyver creates user-friendly, business-driven tools for rapid app creation. AppGyver composer lets companies and developers create and distribute sophisticated business to business and business to employee apps. It builds smart internal apps for data collection, mobile forms, workflow automation, process improvement.
Source: www.educba.com

Materialize CSS Reviews

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Material Design is a design language that combines classic principles of successful design with innovation and technology. One of the downsides of Materialize is that it does not support older versions of web browsers, and sometimes it does not handle certain nestings of components properly, resulting in an odd appearance.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Materialize is a modern responsive front-end framework based on the Material Design principles of Google. Material design is a design language created by Google, which combines traditional design methods with innovations and technology.
Source: hackr.io
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
Created by Google in 2014, Materialize is a responsive UI framework for websites and Android apps. It provides many ready-to-use components, classes, and starter templates. It is compatible with Sass and has a responsive layout based on Bootstrap’s 12-column grid format. The best part? Its extensive color palettes. So, if you want to work with Material Design (Google’s...
Source: hackr.io
15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives
It’s specifically designed to help you develop faster using a standard template and customizable components. As the name suggests, Materialize is based on the basic principles of Material Design.
10 of the Best Bootstrap Alternatives
Materialize is a Design-inspired front-end framework that offers everything you need to create beautiful websites and apps. It includes a responsive grid system, CSS components, and animation libraries. Materialize is also easy to use and customizable, making it the perfect choice for any project. Furthermore, a single basic responsive framework across all phases minimizes...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Materialize CSS should be more popular than AppGyver Composer. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AppGyver Composer mentions (4)

Materialize CSS mentions (26)

  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it integrates animations and components to provide feedback to users. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Front-end Framework: Comparing Bootstrap, Foundation and Materialize
    Materialize was created by a team of developers at Google, inspired by the principles of Material Design. Material Design is a design language developed by Google that emphasizes tactile surfaces, realistic lighting, and bold, graphic interfaces. Materialize aims to bring these principles to web development by providing a framework with ready-to-use components and styles based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Took a web development job without much experience, am I doomed?
    If you wanna make it look nice use materialize css works great with Django templates. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Best 3 Bootstrap Alternatives
    You can also visit the Materialize website and GitHub repository which currently has garnered over 38k likes and has been forked over 4k times by developers. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • All About Hacktober Fest 2022 You Need To Know
    This repository consists of files required to deploy a Web App or PWA created with Materialize Css. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AppGyver Composer and Materialize CSS, you can also consider the following products

OutSystems - Build Enterprise-Grade Apps Fast.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

WompMobile - WompMobile offers tow kind of functions – first creating new mobile apps and secondly converting the websites into mobile applications.

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Oracle Mobile Application - Oracle Mobile Application framework or Oracle Mobile Application development platform is a hybrid mobile framework for rapidly developing single source applications for many platforms and devices.

Foundation - The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world