Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apify VS Editor.js

Compare Apify VS Editor.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apify logo Apify

Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output
  • Apify Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

Apify is a JavaScript & Node.js based data extraction tool for websites that crawls lists of URLs and automates workflows on the web. With Apify you can manage and automatically scale a pool of headless Chrome / Puppeteer instances, maintain queues of URLs to crawl, store crawling results locally or in the cloud, rotate proxies and much more.

  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

Apify features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Apify provides a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users of all technical levels to create and manage web scraping tasks.
  • Scalability
    Apify is built to handle tasks of various sizes, from small-scale projects to enterprise-level operations, making it a scalable solution.
  • Integration and API Support
    It offers extensive API support, allowing for seamless integration with other tools and systems to enhance automated workflows.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize their scraping bots (actors) with different settings and scripts to fit specific needs and requirements.
  • Cloud-based
    Being a cloud-based platform, Apify allows users to run their scraping tasks without needing local resources, which is convenient and efficient.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    Apify provides thorough documentation and tutorials, which help users get started quickly and solve issues efficiently.
  • Community and Support
    Apify has an active community and solid customer support to assist users with their needs and enhance their overall experience.

Possible disadvantages of Apify

  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, there may still be a learning curve for those new to web scraping and automation.
  • Cost
    Apify can be expensive compared to other web scraping tools, particularly for extensive use cases that require high volumes of data.
  • Dependency on External Factors
    Web scraping often depends on the stability of the target websites. Changes in website structures can break scripts, requiring ongoing maintenance.
  • Performance Limitations
    The performance of cloud-based scraping tasks can be affected by network latency and other external factors beyond user control.
  • Potential Legal Issues
    Web scraping can raise legal concerns, particularly when scraping data from websites that restrict such activities in their terms of service.
  • Resource Intensity
    Complex scraping tasks can be resource-intensive, potentially requiring higher-tier subscriptions and more computing resources, driving up costs.

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

Apify videos

Apify product news - 2019/01/30

Editor.js videos

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apify and Editor.js)
Web Scraping
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100
Data Extraction
100 100%
0% 0
Rich Text Editor
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apify and Editor.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apify and Editor.js

Apify Reviews

Top 15 Best TinyTask Alternatives in 2022
This is another tinytask alternative. For you to link various web services and APIs, Apify has provided many web integration options. You can add data processing and customised computation processes in addition to letting the data flow between them. With the data that is freely accessible on the web, you may provide crucial insights, and easy lead creation allows you to...

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apify seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apify mentions (26)

  • How to scrape TikTok using Python
    For deployment, we'll use the Apify platform. It's a simple and effective environment for cloud deployment, allowing efficient interaction with your crawler. Call it via API, schedule tasks, integrate with various services, and much more. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
  • How to scrape Bluesky with Python
    We already have a fully functional implementation for local execution. Let us explore how to adapt it for running on the Apify Platform and transform in Apify Actor. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Web scraping with GPT-4o: powerful but expensive
    We've had the best success by first converting the HTML to a simpler format (i.e. markdown) before passing it to the LLM. There are a few ways to do this that we've tried, namely Extractus[0] and dom-to-semantic-markdown[1]. Internally we use Apify[2] and Firecrawl[3] for Magic Loops[4] that run in the cloud, both of which have options for simplifying pages built-in, but for our Chrome Extension we use... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Current problems and mistakes of web scraping in Python and tricks to solve them!
    Developed by Apify, it is a Python adaptation of their famous JS framework crawlee, first released on Jul 9, 2019. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Show HN: Crawlee for Python – a web scraping and browser automation library
    Hey all, This is Jan, the founder of [Apify](https://apify.com/)—a full-stack web scraping platform. After the success of [Crawlee for JavaScript](https://github.com/apify/crawlee/) today! The main features are: - A unified programming interface for both HTTP (HTTPX with BeautifulSoup) & headless browser crawling (Playwright). - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
View more

Editor.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Editor.js yet. Tracking of Editor.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apify and Editor.js, you can also consider the following products

import.io - Import. io helps its users find the internet data they need, organize and store it, and transform it into a format that provides them with the context they need.

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

Scrapy - Scrapy | A Fast and Powerful Scraping and Web Crawling Framework

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

ParseHub - ParseHub is a free web scraping tool. With our advanced web scraper, extracting data is as easy as clicking the data you need.

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.