API Blueprint VS Webhook.site

As for the actual process of building the contract, what works well for me is using API Blueprint-style Markdown in a compatible tool like Apiary, which renders your content into Swagger-like documentation as you type. This way, I and others can mutually "live-scribe" the API contract as we discuss, and seeing it on-screen helps to get people on the same page (and sometimes highlight potential issues that would... Source: 11 months ago

I’m not sure a JS library qualifies as a PL. Or automation software (SoftStack). Or an API description language. Or a build system. Source: over 1 year ago

Create a Proper API Documentation The following open-source projects can help you with creating documentation for your APIs: APIBluePrint Swagger. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

A common complaint about OpenAPI is that it’s difficult to learn and to read. Consequently, over the years we’ve seen many alternatives to OpenAPI, such as RAML, WADL, API Blueprint, and others. The problem with many of these alternatives is that in most cases they aren’t really more readable or easier to learn. Simpler description languages also tend to support less capabilities for documenting API features.... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

For the context of this post, only the first task is essential. In it, the team works together to define the API contract. They discuss data format, whether the API will be Rest or RPC, authentication, data compression, and other vital issues. The delivery of this task is the documentation, preferably in a standard like OpenAPI or API Blueprint (my preferred format). - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Webhook.site - Verify webhooks, outbound HTTP requests, or emails with a custom URL. A temporary URL and email address are always free. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

The automatic updates use webhooks from version control system platforms such as GitHub and GitLab. In this article, for correct working, the services should be deployed somewhere, like Cloud Platform Providers, but to keep things simple, we will do it on a local machine. You can create a webhook inside the repository’s settings section and get an idea of what information can be obtained from the webhook... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

While inspecting the content of a webhook payload can be useful (for example by forwarding the webhook to tools like webhook.site), developers also require the capability to receive incoming webhooks directly in the application running on their laptop. It is a matter of more effective testing that verifies the correct processing on the incoming events and the associated workflow that follows. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

The webhook fires natively from inside the site, it's Yith Subscription plugin. I can get the webhook out and see the information if I test on a place like webhook.site. Everything works fine there. Source: 5 months ago

With the Dockerfile written we can now start the docker containers, but first, you need to have a webhook URL to try this project. You can easily get a free one at https://webhook.site. Once it is done, create a file called .env at the root of the project, where the docker-compose.yaml file is present. Then, make sure to have similar content. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago