Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache UserGrid VS Azure Mobile Apps

Compare Apache UserGrid VS Azure Mobile Apps and see what are their differences

Apache UserGrid logo Apache UserGrid

Usergrid is an open-source BaaS enabling developers to rapidly build web and/or mobile applications. 

Azure Mobile Apps logo Azure Mobile Apps

Build engaging cross-platform and native apps for iOS, Android, Windows or Mac with Azure's Mobile App Service.
  • Apache UserGrid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-01
  • Azure Mobile Apps Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-04

Apache UserGrid features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache UserGrid is designed to be highly scalable, allowing developers to handle large volumes of requests and data seamlessly across distributed systems.
  • Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS)
    UserGrid provides a backend-as-a-service solution that simplifies mobile and web application development by managing complex backend processes, such as storage, user management, and data analytics.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, UserGrid allows developers to access, modify, and contribute to the codebase, fostering community collaboration and transparency.
  • REST API
    UserGrid offers a RESTful API, which makes it easy for developers to integrate its services into various applications using standard HTTP requests.
  • Flexible Data Model
    The platform provides a flexible, schema-less data model that allows developers to store and manage various types of data without worrying about predefined schemas.

Possible disadvantages of Apache UserGrid

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up Apache UserGrid can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for developers who are not familiar with its architecture and requirements.
  • Limited Documentation
    The documentation for UserGrid is not comprehensive or regularly updated, which can pose challenges for developers trying to troubleshoot issues or understand its full capabilities.
  • Performance Overhead
    While scalable, the abstraction layers in UserGrid may introduce performance overhead, making it less optimal for certain high-performance applications compared to custom backend solutions.
  • Community Support
    Though UserGrid is open source, the active community support might be limited compared to more popular open-source projects, potentially slowing down development and issue resolution.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running UserGrid can be resource-intensive, requiring significant server resources and infrastructure management, which might not be ideal for small-scale applications or startups with limited budgets.

Azure Mobile Apps features and specs

  • Scalability
    Azure Mobile Apps provides a scalable platform that can handle a large number of users and requests. As your app's user base grows, you can easily scale up your resources to meet demand.
  • Integration
    Azure Mobile Apps offers seamless integration with various Azure services such as Azure Functions, Azure SQL Database, and Cosmos DB, making it easier to build comprehensive solutions.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Developers can create cross-platform mobile applications using Azure Mobile Apps, supporting iOS, Android, and Windows platforms with a unified backend service.
  • Offline Sync
    Azure Mobile Apps provides offline data synchronization capabilities, allowing apps to work seamlessly even when there is no internet connectivity.
  • Security
    With features such as authentication via Azure Active Directory, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft Accounts, Azure Mobile Apps helps in securing app data and user access.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Mobile Apps

  • Complexity
    New users may find Azure Mobile Apps complex to set up and configure, especially if they are not familiar with Azure services or cloud environments.
  • Cost
    While Azure Mobile Apps offers a range of features, the cost can increase significantly depending on the app's usage and the number of integrated services.
  • Learning Curve
    The platform may have a steep learning curve for developers who are new to Azure, requiring time to understand its full capabilities and best practices.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    Although offline sync is supported, many features and services of Azure Mobile Apps depend on stable internet connectivity, which could pose challenges in remote areas.
  • Limited Native Features
    Compared to some native development environments, Azure Mobile Apps may have limitations in accessing certain native device features or achieving maximum performance.

Apache UserGrid videos

Running Apache Usergrid Open Source BaaS on Cloud Foundry

More videos:

  • Review - Devnexus 2015 - Apache Usergrid, an open source BaaS - Lee Grey

Azure Mobile Apps videos

No Azure Mobile Apps videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache UserGrid and Azure Mobile Apps)
Developer Tools
44 44%
56% 56
Realtime Backend / API
45 45%
55% 55
App Development
45 45%
55% 55
Backend As A Service
52 52%
48% 48

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache UserGrid and Azure Mobile Apps. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache UserGrid and Azure Mobile Apps, you can also consider the following products

Parse - Build applications faster with object and file storage, user authentication, push notifications, dashboard and more out of the box.

AWS Amplify - JavaScript library for app development using cloud services

AnyPresence - AnyPresence is an Enterprise Backend as a Service for mobile app development and API augmentation.

MongoDB Stitch - The serverless platform from MongoDB

Oracle Mobile Hub - Oracle Cloud allows you to provide secure mobile access to all your data and applications.

Apps Panel - Apps Panel is a mobile backend-as-a-service enabling developers to manage their mobile development process.