Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Tapestry VS Spring Boot

Compare Apache Tapestry VS Spring Boot and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache Tapestry logo Apache Tapestry

Apache Tapestry is a programming environment designed to enhance Java scripting. It's produced by Apache Software Foundation, which was founded in 1999 in Maryland. Read more about Apache Tapestry.

Spring Boot logo Spring Boot

Create Spring-powered, production-grade applications and services with absolute minimum fuss
  • Apache Tapestry Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-22
  • Spring Boot Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11

Apache Tapestry features and specs

  • Component-Based Design
    Apache Tapestry offers a component-based architecture, which promotes reusable and modular code, making it easier to manage and maintain complex web applications.
  • Convention Over Configuration
    Tapestry reduces the need for extensive configuration files, allowing for a more streamlined development process by using sensible defaults and conventions.
  • Built-in Scalability
    The framework is designed to handle scalability concerns efficiently, providing features like built-in data caching and optimized rendering to support high-performance applications.
  • Live Class Reloading
    Tapestry enables developers to see changes instantly without restarting the server, thanks to its live class reloading feature, which accelerates the development cycle.
  • Robust Community and Documentation
    With an active community and comprehensive documentation, developers can find support and resources easily, which can aid in efficient problem-solving and learning.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Tapestry

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New developers might experience a steep learning curve due to the framework's unique concepts and paradigms, which may differ significantly from more mainstream technologies.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to some other web frameworks, Tapestry has a smaller ecosystem of third-party plugins and extensions, which might limit some functionality and tool integration.
  • Fewer Resources and Examples
    Due to its less widespread use, there are fewer tutorials, examples, and stack overflow questions answered, which can be a challenge for newcomers or when encountering specific issues.
  • Limited IDE Support
    While most major IDEs support Tapestry, the support might not be as robust or feature-rich as with more popular frameworks, potentially affecting productivity.
  • Infrequent Updates
    Tapestry may not receive updates and new features as frequently as other more actively developed frameworks, which can slow down the adoption of new web technologies.

Spring Boot features and specs

  • Rapid Development
    Spring Boot simplifies the process of setting up and developing new Spring applications with a range of out-of-the-box configurations and defaults.
  • Microservices Support
    Ideal for developing microservices architecture thanks to its embedded servers, simplified setup, and streamlined deployment process.
  • Strong Community and Ecosystem
    Backed by a large and active community, and supported by a wide variety of extensions and plugins, enhancing its capability and support.
  • Embedded Servers
    Supports embedded servers such as Tomcat, Jetty, and Undertow, which simplifies deployment and reduces configuration complexity.
  • Auto-Configuration
    Automatically configures most of the application’s components, reducing the need for manual setup and configuration.
  • Easy Integration
    Facilitates easy integration with various data sources, messaging systems, and other enterprise systems via Spring’s extensive ecosystem.
  • Production-Ready Features
    Includes various production-ready features like health checks, metrics, externalized configuration, and monitoring, making it easy to manage applications in production.

Possible disadvantages of Spring Boot

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its benefits, Spring Boot has a complex learning curve for beginners due to its extensive range of features and options.
  • Resource Consumption
    Spring Boot applications can sometimes be resource-intensive, potentially leading to higher costs in terms of memory and CPU usage.
  • Complexity in Large Projects
    While Spring Boot is great for simpler projects, it can become overly complex and harder to manage in very large applications with numerous dependencies and configurations.
  • Limited Flexibility with Embedded Servers
    While using embedded servers is convenient, it can also limit flexibility and control over server configuration and behaviors compared to standalone server setups.
  • Dependency Management
    Although auto-configuration is a significant advantage, it can sometimes lead to confusion or conflicts in dependency management, making troubleshooting more challenging.
  • Performance Overhead
    The auto-configuration and abstraction layers, while simplifying development, can introduce performance overhead, which might not be desirable in high-performance and fine-tuned applications.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Tapestry and Spring Boot)
Web Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
No Code
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Tapestry and Spring Boot. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Tapestry and Spring Boot

Apache Tapestry Reviews

17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
You can write Tapestry pages and components as plain old Java objects (POJOs), so you can access the entire Java ecosystem from the framework. Besides Java, Tapestry also supports the Groovy and Scala programming languages and integrates with other Java frameworks such as Hibernate and Spring. Tapestry has been built with performance in mind; therefore it provides you with...
Source: raygun.com

Spring Boot Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
Spring Boot — Java developers’ shortcut to a galaxy of applications. It’s a leap forward, ditching the boilerplate, no longer about “all the setup”, it’s about “all the creation”.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Tapestry seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Tapestry mentions (1)

  • Why is Java templating/server rendering losing ground?
    Or good old https://tapestry.apache.org/. Source: about 3 years ago

Spring Boot mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Spring Boot yet. Tracking of Spring Boot recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Tapestry and Spring Boot, you can also consider the following products

Grails - An Open Source, full stack, web application framework for the JVM

QuickBase - Quickbase provides a no-code operational agility platform that enables organizations to improve operations through real time insights and automation across complex processes and disparate systems. ​​

Apache Wicket - HelloWorld demonstrates the basic structure of a web application in Wicket. A Label component is used to display a message on the home page for the application. In all the Wicket examples, you have to put all files in the same package directory.

Konfigure - APARTMENTS | VILLA | WORKSPACE | RETAIL

Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.

Metavine Platform - Metavine Platform is a comprehensive Platform-as-a-Service that help businesses build agility and compete effectively in the digital world by enabling them to iterate and create apps quickly.