Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Subversion VS WebFaction

Compare Apache Subversion VS WebFaction and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

WebFaction logo WebFaction

Hosting for developers: full shell access to fast servers with all your favorite tools pre-installed and maintained for you.
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27
  • WebFaction Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

WebFaction features and specs

  • User-Friendly Control Panel
    WebFaction offers a user-friendly control panel, making it easy for users to manage their hosting services without needing advanced technical skills.
  • Wide Range of Supported Applications
    It supports a wide variety of applications and frameworks, such as Python, Ruby on Rails, PHP, and Node.js, providing flexibility for developers to work with their preferred technology stack.
  • Customizable Server Environment
    Users have the ability to customize their server environment, which is useful for developers who need specific configurations or custom setups.
  • Reliable Performance
    WebFaction is known for its reliable performance and uptime, ensuring that websites and applications remain accessible and functional for users.
  • Strong Developer Community
    Being developer-focused, it has a robust community and plenty of online resources, helping users resolve issues and share knowledge effectively.

Possible disadvantages of WebFaction

  • Limited Beginner Support
    While the control panel is user-friendly, beginners without any technical background may find it hard to get started due to a lack of guided support or tutorials.
  • Higher Cost for Additional Resources
    The cost can become relatively high when scaling up resources, which may not be ideal for startups or small businesses with limited budgets.
  • No Free Plan
    WebFaction does not offer a free hosting plan, which might deter users who are looking for cost-free solutions initially before committing to a paid plan.
  • Ownership and Management
    WebFaction was acquired by GoDaddy, and some users have concerns regarding changes in service quality, customer support, and pricing since the acquisition.
  • Deprecated Features
    As technology and hosting standards evolve, some features provided by WebFaction might become outdated or less efficient compared to newer hosting providers that offer cutting-edge solutions.

Analysis of Apache Subversion

Overall verdict

  • Apache Subversion is a solid choice for projects that require a centralized version control system with robust access controls and support for large file handling. While it may not offer the distributed features and branching flexibility of systems like Git, it remains a reliable and efficient tool for many development environments.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Subversion (SVN) is a centralized version control system that provides a simple model for versioning, which can be easier to understand for users who prefer a linear, sequential history of changes. It ensures a single source of truth and is well-suited for teams that require tight access control over the repository. SVN is also known for handling large files and binary files better than some distributed systems.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with strict version control policies
  • Teams that need centralized control over versioning
  • Projects with large binary files that need versioning
  • Users who are more comfortable with a sequential workflow

Apache Subversion videos

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

WebFaction videos

Setting up a Webfaction account

More videos:

  • Review - Webfaction vs Godaddy
  • Review - webhostingbuzz vs webfaction

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Subversion and WebFaction)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Hosting
0 0%
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Subversion and WebFaction. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Subversion and WebFaction, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Sedo Domain Parking - Earn money with domain parking at Sedo! Award-winning parking program ✓ Fast ✓ Easy & accessible ✓ Register now and get started!

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Ace Cloud Hosting - QuickBooks Hosting - QuickBooks Cloud Hosting: Seamless Accounting at Your Fingertips

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

Bunny.net - BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing.