Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Subversion VS Surround SCM

Compare Apache Subversion VS Surround SCM and see what are their differences

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

Surround SCM logo Surround SCM

Secure version control of digital assets.
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27
  • Surround SCM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

Surround SCM features and specs

  • Robust Version Control
    Surround SCM offers a comprehensive version control system that supports a variety of file types and branching strategies, allowing teams to efficiently manage changes and collaborate effectively.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It is compatible with multiple operating systems, enabling users to integrate it into diverse IT environments without compatibility issues.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Surround SCM can be integrated with other tools for bug tracking, requirements management, and continuous integration, fostering a more connected workflow.
  • Security Features
    It provides robust security measures, including access controls and audit trails, to ensure that projects are protected and compliant with industry standards.
  • Graphical User Interface
    Offers a user-friendly GUI that simplifies the management of files and revisions, reducing the learning curve for new users.

Possible disadvantages of Surround SCM

  • Cost
    Surround SCM can be expensive for small teams or startups, as it may require significant investment to implement and maintain.
  • Complexity
    It may have a steeper learning curve for users not familiar with SCM tools, requiring additional training or support to utilize all features effectively.
  • Performance
    In some cases, users might experience performance issues, especially when dealing with large repositories or high-volume transactions.
  • Limited Community Support
    Being a commercial tool, it might not have as extensive a user community as open-source alternatives, leading to fewer resources for troubleshooting and best practices.
  • Interface Limitations
    While the GUI is effective, some users may find it outdated or not as intuitive as that of other modern SCM tools, impacting overall user experience.

Apache Subversion videos

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

Surround SCM videos

Performing a Code Review in Surround SCM

More videos:

  • Review - Conducting Code Reviews with Surround SCM
  • Review - Starting a Code Review in Surround SCM

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Subversion and Surround SCM)
Git
67 67%
33% 33
Code Collaboration
66 66%
34% 34
Version Control
72 72%
28% 28
Git Tools
61 61%
39% 39

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Subversion and Surround SCM. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Subversion and Surround SCM, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

GitKraken - The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.

Azure DevOps - Visual Studio dev tools & services make app development easy for any platform & language. Try our Mac & Windows code editor, IDE, or Azure DevOps for free.