Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Subversion VS Pijul

Compare Apache Subversion VS Pijul and see what are their differences

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

Pijul logo Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source distributed version control system based on a sound theory of...
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27
  • Pijul Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

Pijul features and specs

  • Patch-Based System
    Pijul is based on a true patch-based model, where changes are stored as patches. This allows for more granular control and the ability to handle conflicts more naturally than in traditional version control systems.
  • Commute-ability
    Pijul allows patches to commute, meaning they can be rearranged freely as long as they do not directly conflict with each other. This can make collaboration simpler as developers can work in parallel seamlessly.
  • Conflict Resolution
    The system offers more sophisticated conflict resolution mechanisms, enabling users to resolve conflicts at the patch level rather than entire commits, making it easier to pinpoint and address issues.
  • Mathematical Foundations
    Pijul is based on a strong theoretical foundation (Darcs theory) that provides a rigorous mathematical framework for version control logic, offering a structured and reliable approach to merging and branching.
  • Branching and Merging
    Branching and merging in Pijul are straightforward and intuitive, eliminating many of the complexities associated with these processes in other systems.

Possible disadvantages of Pijul

  • Maturity and Adoption
    As a relatively new system, Pijul may not be as mature as other VCS solutions like Git, possibly leading to a lack of community support, plugins, and resources.
  • Tooling
    The ecosystem around Pijul, including integrations with other tools like IDEs and CI/CD systems, is still in development, potentially complicating its use in professional environments.
  • Learning Curve
    The patch-based approach and the principles behind Pijul might be unfamiliar to users accustomed to traditional version control systems, resulting in a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance
    For very large repositories or numerous patches, performance could potentially be an issue due to the complexity of operations on patches, though active improvements are being made.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    The community and ecosystem around Pijul are smaller compared to more established version control systems, which may hinder the availability of guides, plug-ins, or extensions.

Apache Subversion videos

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

Pijul videos

No Pijul videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Subversion and Pijul)
Git
56 56%
44% 44
Code Collaboration
56 56%
44% 44
Version Control
100 100%
0% 0
Git Tools
36 36%
64% 64

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Subversion and Pijul. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pijul seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 48 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Subversion mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Subversion yet. Tracking of Apache Subversion recommendations started around May 2021.

Pijul mentions (48)

  • Evo: Version control that works the way you think
    Obligatory link to https://pijul.org/ which I’d say also fits the description - in which you really commit patches instead of whole trees and patches are pretend. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • I'm daily driving Jujutsu, and maybe you should too
    Simplicity is in the eye of the beholder but Pijul[0] claims to be "easy to learn and use". [0] https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: If you were rewriting Emacs from scratch, what would you do differently?
    >> see jujutsu nowadays I'm looking at pijul.. https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Jujutsu: A Next Generation Replacement for Git
    How does this compare to Pijul[1]? [1] https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Local First, Forever
    Using theory of patches would better compliment the current approach. Integrating a scm such as https://pijul.org or atleast the underlying tech would allow for better conflict resolutions. Transferring patches should also allow for more efficient use of io. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Subversion and Pijul, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

darcs - Darcs is an advanced revision control system, for source code or other files.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

Gitless - Gitless is an experimental version control system built on top of Git.

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.