Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Subversion VS Kallithea

Compare Apache Subversion VS Kallithea and see what are their differences

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

Kallithea logo Kallithea

Kallithea, a free software source code management system supporting two leading version control systems, Mercurial and Git.
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27
  • Kallithea Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

Kallithea features and specs

  • Open Source
    Kallithea is an open-source platform, allowing users to freely modify and distribute the code to suit their needs.
  • Multi-VCS Support
    Kallithea supports multiple version control systems including Mercurial and Git, making it flexible for different project requirements.
  • Simple Interface
    The platform offers a user-friendly and simple interface, which makes it accessible for users with varying technical expertise.
  • Granular Permissions
    Kallithea provides detailed permission settings for users and repositories, enhancing security and collaboration control.
  • Built-in Code Review
    It includes built-in code review and repository management features which streamline the development workflow.
  • Active Community
    The Kallithea project has an active community that contributes to continuous enhancement and provides support.

Possible disadvantages of Kallithea

  • Limited Integrations
    Kallithea lacks the extensive third-party integrations commonly found in other SCM platforms like GitHub or GitLab.
  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and installation of Kallithea can be complex and might require significant time and effort, particularly for users unfamiliar with Python environments.
  • Less Comprehensive Documentation
    The documentation for Kallithea is less comprehensive compared to competitors, which can hinder troubleshooting and advanced usage for new users.
  • Scalability Concerns
    Some users have reported scalability issues with larger repositories or large numbers of users, which might make it less ideal for very large projects.
  • UI Customization Limitations
    There are limited options for customizing the user interface, which may not accommodate all organizational branding or usability preferences.

Analysis of Apache Subversion

Overall verdict

  • Apache Subversion is a solid choice for projects that require a centralized version control system with robust access controls and support for large file handling. While it may not offer the distributed features and branching flexibility of systems like Git, it remains a reliable and efficient tool for many development environments.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Subversion (SVN) is a centralized version control system that provides a simple model for versioning, which can be easier to understand for users who prefer a linear, sequential history of changes. It ensures a single source of truth and is well-suited for teams that require tight access control over the repository. SVN is also known for handling large files and binary files better than some distributed systems.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with strict version control policies
  • Teams that need centralized control over versioning
  • Projects with large binary files that need versioning
  • Users who are more comfortable with a sequential workflow

Apache Subversion videos

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

Kallithea videos

Niki Gyroplane Kallithea Review 2020

More videos:

  • Review - Kallithea hotel review | Hotels in Iraklitsa | Greek Hotels
  • Review - Inside Kallithea's cockpit

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Subversion and Kallithea)
Git
72 72%
28% 28
Code Collaboration
69 69%
31% 31
Version Control
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Subversion and Kallithea. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kallithea seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Subversion mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Subversion yet. Tracking of Apache Subversion recommendations started around May 2021.

Kallithea mentions (1)

  • Hacker News top posts: Apr 6, 2021
    Kallithea – Self-hosted alternative to GitHub\ (56 comments). Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Subversion and Kallithea, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.