Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache RocketMQ VS Kafka

Compare Apache RocketMQ VS Kafka and see what are their differences

Apache RocketMQ logo Apache RocketMQ

Apache RocketMQ™ is an open source distributed messaging and streaming data platform. Latest release v4.5.2

Kafka logo Kafka

Apache Kafka is publish-subscribe messaging rethought as a distributed commit log.
  • Apache RocketMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-30
  • Kafka Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-24

Apache RocketMQ features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Kafka features and specs

  • High Throughput
    Apache Kafka is capable of handling a large volume of data with very low latency, making it ideal for real-time data processing applications.
  • Scalability
    Kafka can effortlessly scale out by adding more brokers to a cluster, allowing it to handle increased data loads.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Kafka offers built-in replication and fault tolerance, ensuring that data is not lost even if some brokers or nodes fail.
  • Durability
    Messages in Kafka are persistently stored on disk, providing durability and data recovery capabilities in case of failures.
  • Stream Processing
    Kafka, along with Kafka Streams, offers powerful stream processing capabilities, allowing real-time data transformation and processing.
  • Ecosystem
    Kafka has a rich ecosystem that includes Kafka Connect for data integration, Kafka Streams for stream processing, and many other tools that make it easier to work with data.
  • Language Support
    Kafka clients are available in multiple programming languages, providing flexibility in choosing the technology stack for your project.

Possible disadvantages of Kafka

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing a Kafka cluster can be complex, requiring expertise in distributed systems and careful configuration.
  • Resource Intensive
    Kafka can be resource-intensive, requiring significant memory and CPU resources, especially at scale.
  • Operational Overhead
    Maintaining Kafka clusters involves considerable operational overhead, including monitoring, tuning, and managing brokers and partitions.
  • Data Ordering
    While Kafka guarantees ordering within a partition, maintaining total order across a topic with multiple partitions can be challenging.
  • Latency
    In certain use-cases, such as strict low-latency requirements, Kafka’s design might introduce higher latency as compared to some specialized messaging systems.
  • Learning Curve
    Kafka has a steep learning curve, which might make it harder for new developers to get started quickly.
  • Data Storage
    Despite Kafka’s durability features, large volumes of data storage can become costly and need careful management to avoid sluggish performance.

Apache RocketMQ videos

Apache RocketMQ - Trillion Messaging in Practice - Von Gosling & Wang Xiaorui, Alibaba Inc.

Kafka videos

Franz Kafka - In The Penal Colony BOOK REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - LITERATURE: Franz Kafka
  • Review - The Trial (Franz Kafka) – Thug Notes Summary & Analysis

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache RocketMQ and Kafka)
Stream Processing
100 100%
0% 0
Log Management
0 0%
100% 100
Data Integration
29 29%
71% 71
Analytics
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache RocketMQ and Kafka. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache RocketMQ and Kafka

Apache RocketMQ Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache RocketMQ yet.
Be the first one to post

Kafka Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
In this article, you learned about Kafka, its features, and some top Kafka Alternatives. Even though Kafka is widely used, the technology segment has advanced to the point where other options can overshadow Kafka’s cons. There are various options available for choosing a stream processing solution. Organizations are increasingly embracing event-driven architectures powered...
Source: hevodata.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache RocketMQ seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache RocketMQ mentions (1)

  • Build a Custom DevOps Platform Based on RocketMQ Prometheus Exporter
    RocketMQ is a distributed message and streaming data platform featuring low latency, high performance, high reliability, trillions of capacity, and flexible extensibility. In other words, it consists of a broker server and a client. The client includes a message producer which sends messages to the broker server and a message consumer. Multiple consumers can form a consumer group to subscribe to and pull messages... Source: over 2 years ago

Kafka mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Kafka yet. Tracking of Kafka recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache RocketMQ and Kafka, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Raygun - Raygun gives developers meaningful insights into problems affecting their applications. Discover issues - Understand the problem - Fix things faster.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Snare - Snare is well known historically as a leader in the event log space.