Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

IBM MQ VS Apache RocketMQ

Compare IBM MQ VS Apache RocketMQ and see what are their differences

IBM MQ logo IBM MQ

IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Apache RocketMQ logo Apache RocketMQ

Apache RocketMQ™ is an open source distributed messaging and streaming data platform. Latest release v4.5.2
  • IBM MQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-03
  • Apache RocketMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-30

IBM MQ features and specs

  • Reliability
    IBM MQ is renowned for its high reliability, ensuring that your messages are delivered once and only once. This is critical for applications where message loss can result in significant operational issues.
  • Security
    It provides robust security features, including authentication, encryption, and authorization, which are essential for protecting sensitive data in transit.
  • Scalability
    IBM MQ can scale horizontally and vertically to meet the demands of growing applications and varying workloads, making it suitable for both small-scale and enterprise-level deployments.
  • Integrations
    It supports a wide range of platforms and programming languages, which makes it easier to integrate with existing systems and applications.
  • Transaction Support
    It offers comprehensive support for transactions, ensuring that multiple related messages are processed in a single unit of work, which can be rolled back if needed.
  • High Availability
    Features like queue manager clustering and multi-instance queue managers provide high availability and disaster recovery capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of IBM MQ

  • Cost
    IBM MQ is a premium product, which means it comes with a significant cost, especially for large-scale enterprise deployments.
  • Complexity
    Setting up and maintaining IBM MQ can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills, which can be a barrier for smaller teams or organizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    It can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial computational resources for its full operation, which may not be ideal for lightweight or resource-constrained environments.
  • Dependency
    Using IBM MQ can create a dependency on IBM’s ecosystem, which might limit flexibility and increase the cost and complexity of switching to a different messaging solution in the future.
  • Learning Curve
    There is a steep learning curve associated with IBM MQ, particularly for new users who are not familiar with message queuing or IBM's specific implementation.
  • Licensing
    The licensing model can be complex and sometimes difficult to navigate, potentially leading to unexpected costs if not carefully managed.

Apache RocketMQ features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

IBM MQ videos

IBM MQ Clustering - Tom Dunlap

More videos:

  • Review - IBM Db2 Analytics Accelerator for z/OS
  • Review - IBM Blockchain Platform - 2019 Review - All You Need to Know
  • Review - IBM Watson Virtual Agent _ (Part 01)
  • Review - IBM MQ V9 Open Source Monitoring
  • Review - IBM Db2 Analytics Accelerator – IDAA Afternoon Show 2019 08 28
  • Review - IBM Blockchain Platform Community Call – Next Generation Platform Tour + Q&A
  • Review - The next generation of the IBM Blockchain Platform

Apache RocketMQ videos

Apache RocketMQ - Trillion Messaging in Practice - Von Gosling & Wang Xiaorui, Alibaba Inc.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to IBM MQ and Apache RocketMQ)
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
91 91%
9% 9
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100
Business & Commerce
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using IBM MQ and Apache RocketMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare IBM MQ and Apache RocketMQ

IBM MQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
IBM MQ is one of the best Kafka Alternatives which has an easy-to-use Interface and High Reliability and Data Security. It also facilitates the interoperability between various applications, either within or outside the organization. IBM MQ allows developers to focus on critical issues and manage any changes to transaction volumes asynchronously due to its simple structure.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
IBM MQ is an official message middleware which shortens the integration of varied applications and data spread throughout numerous platforms. It employs a message queue to share the info and offers a distinct messaging service for cloud systems, IoT gadgets, and mobile environments. By linking every element virtually from modest device to most complicated industrial...
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
IBM MQ is an easily usable interface with a great deal of reliability and security. Support is readily available in case needed anytime. It looks at handling the interoperability between various applications, be it within the organization or outside. It has asynchronous competencies and offers message integrity and relentless delivery. Because of its simplistic nature, it...

Apache RocketMQ Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache RocketMQ yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache RocketMQ seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

IBM MQ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM MQ yet. Tracking of IBM MQ recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache RocketMQ mentions (1)

  • Build a Custom DevOps Platform Based on RocketMQ Prometheus Exporter
    RocketMQ is a distributed message and streaming data platform featuring low latency, high performance, high reliability, trillions of capacity, and flexible extensibility. In other words, it consists of a broker server and a client. The client includes a message producer which sends messages to the broker server and a message consumer. Multiple consumers can form a consumer group to subscribe to and pull messages... Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing IBM MQ and Apache RocketMQ, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Ethereum - Ethereum is a decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Hyperledger - Hyperledger is a multi-project open source collaborative effort hosted by The Linux Foundation, created to advance cross-industry blockchain technologies.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform - Anypoint Platform is a unified, highly productive, hybrid integration platform that creates an application network of apps, data and devices with API-led connectivity.