Software Alternatives & Reviews

Apache Qpid VS Mule ESB

Compare Apache Qpid VS Mule ESB and see what are their differences

Apache Qpid logo Apache Qpid

Apache Qpid makes messaging tools that speak AMQP and support many languages and platforms.

Mule ESB logo Mule ESB

Connect with our lightweight powerful ESB. Build integrations for use cases ranging from legacy services with lightweight APIs to SOA re-platforming connectivity across the entire enterprise.
  • Apache Qpid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-09
  • Mule ESB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18

Apache Qpid videos

Building a scalable and highly available messaging system with the Apache Qpid Community

Mule ESB videos

MuleSoft Interview Questions and Answers |Mule ESB | MuleSoft|

More videos:

  • Review - MuleSoft | Mule ESB 4 | Session 3 | Microservices | Monolithic vs Microservices

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Qpid and Mule ESB)
Stream Processing
100 100%
0% 0
Web Service Automation
25 25%
75% 75
Data Integration
30 30%
70% 70
Automation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Qpid and Mule ESB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Qpid and Mule ESB, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Apache Camel - Apache Camel is a versatile open-source integration framework based on known enterprise integration patterns.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.