Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Qpid VS Apache ActiveMQ

Compare Apache Qpid VS Apache ActiveMQ and see what are their differences

Apache Qpid logo Apache Qpid

Apache Qpid makes messaging tools that speak AMQP and support many languages and platforms.

Apache ActiveMQ logo Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.
  • Apache Qpid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-09
  • Apache ActiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

Apache Qpid features and specs

  • AMQP Compliance
    Apache Qpid fully supports the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), allowing for interoperable messaging between compliant systems.
  • Enterprise Features
    Qpid offers many enterprise-grade features such as message queuing, message brokering, and scalable architectures, making it suitable for large-scale applications.
  • Multiple Language Support
    It provides client libraries in multiple languages including Java, C++, Python, and .NET, offering flexibility in application development.
  • Open Source
    As an Apache Software Foundation project, Qpid is open source, which makes it cost-effective and provides the flexibility to modify and extend the source code.
  • Support for Multiple Platforms
    Qpid can be deployed on various operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it versatile for different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Qpid

  • Complexity
    The comprehensive set of features and configurations can add complexity to setup and management, especially for smaller use cases.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its rich feature set and the nuances of AMQP, there can be a significant learning curve for new users.
  • Community and Ecosystem Size
    Compared to other messaging systems like RabbitMQ or Kafka, Qpid has a smaller community and ecosystem, which may result in fewer available resources and plugins.
  • Performance Overhead
    The support for a broad set of features might introduce performance overhead compared to more lightweight messaging systems.
  • Documentation Quality
    While adequate, the documentation might not be as comprehensive or as user-friendly as commercial or more widespread open-source alternatives.

Apache ActiveMQ features and specs

  • Open Source
    ActiveMQ is open-source under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. This can lead to cost savings compared to commercial solutions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    ActiveMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, including AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, Stomp, and others, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and applications.
  • Java Integration
    Written in Java, ActiveMQ integrates well with JVM-based applications and other Apache projects like Camel and Karaf, making it a good fit for Java-centric environments.
  • High Availability
    Features like broker clustering, network of brokers, and failover support provide robust high availability options, ensuring message delivery even in case of failures.
  • Performance and Scalability
    ActiveMQ can handle a large number of messages and users by scaling horizontally, making it suitable for both small and enterprise-level applications.
  • Admin Console
    ActiveMQ provides a web-based admin console for easy management and monitoring of the message broker, simplifying administrative tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ActiveMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for newcomers. It often requires a steep learning curve to understand all the available options and optimizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    ActiveMQ can be resource-intensive, particularly in high-throughput scenarios, which may necessitate more robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Latency
    In certain configurations, ActiveMQ may exhibit higher latency compared to other brokers, which might not make it suitable for use cases requiring real-time guarantees.
  • Java Dependency
    As a Java-based solution, ActiveMQ requires the JVM, which can be a downside for organizations that have standardized on other technology stacks.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ActiveMQ, it may not be as large or as active as those for other, similar open-source projects. This can lead to slower responses to issues and fewer community-based resources.
  • Documentation
    Though comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be difficult to navigate, making it challenging for users to find specific information quickly.

Apache Qpid videos

Building a scalable and highly available messaging system with the Apache Qpid Community

Apache ActiveMQ videos

No Apache ActiveMQ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Qpid and Apache ActiveMQ)
Stream Processing
16 16%
84% 84
Data Integration
13 13%
87% 87
Web Service Automation
14 14%
86% 86
Communication
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Qpid and Apache ActiveMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Qpid and Apache ActiveMQ

Apache Qpid Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Qpid yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache ActiveMQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates integration with many applications based on different platforms. However, ActiveMQ’s high-end data accessibility capabilities are complemented by its load balancing,...
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesn’t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message system. It is utilized to send bulk message services.
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting clients written in languages like Python, C, C++, JavaScript, etc. With the help of the AMQP protocol, integration with many applications with different platforms...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache ActiveMQ seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Qpid mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Qpid yet. Tracking of Apache Qpid recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache ActiveMQ mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Qpid and Apache ActiveMQ, you can also consider the following products

ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Amazon MQ - Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Easily migrate messaging.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Amazon SQS - Amazon Simple Queue Service is a fully managed message queuing service.