Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Qpid VS Amazon SQS

Compare Apache Qpid VS Amazon SQS and see what are their differences

Apache Qpid logo Apache Qpid

Apache Qpid makes messaging tools that speak AMQP and support many languages and platforms.

Amazon SQS logo Amazon SQS

Amazon Simple Queue Service is a fully managed message queuing service.
  • Apache Qpid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-09
  • Amazon SQS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-22

Apache Qpid features and specs

  • AMQP Compliance
    Apache Qpid fully supports the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), allowing for interoperable messaging between compliant systems.
  • Enterprise Features
    Qpid offers many enterprise-grade features such as message queuing, message brokering, and scalable architectures, making it suitable for large-scale applications.
  • Multiple Language Support
    It provides client libraries in multiple languages including Java, C++, Python, and .NET, offering flexibility in application development.
  • Open Source
    As an Apache Software Foundation project, Qpid is open source, which makes it cost-effective and provides the flexibility to modify and extend the source code.
  • Support for Multiple Platforms
    Qpid can be deployed on various operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it versatile for different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Qpid

  • Complexity
    The comprehensive set of features and configurations can add complexity to setup and management, especially for smaller use cases.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its rich feature set and the nuances of AMQP, there can be a significant learning curve for new users.
  • Community and Ecosystem Size
    Compared to other messaging systems like RabbitMQ or Kafka, Qpid has a smaller community and ecosystem, which may result in fewer available resources and plugins.
  • Performance Overhead
    The support for a broad set of features might introduce performance overhead compared to more lightweight messaging systems.
  • Documentation Quality
    While adequate, the documentation might not be as comprehensive or as user-friendly as commercial or more widespread open-source alternatives.

Amazon SQS features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon SQS scales automatically to handle an unlimited number of messages, ensuring that your application can support any level of demand without manual intervention.
  • Reliability
    Amazon SQS offers guaranteed delivery of messages, with multiple copies of each message stored redundantly across multiple servers and data centers.
  • Flexibility
    SQS supports both standard and FIFO (First In, First Out) queues, giving you the option to choose the type of queue that best suits your application's requirements.
  • Ease of Use
    Amazon SQS is fully managed, meaning you don't need to worry about provisioning or managing infrastructure. Integration is straightforward with a well-documented API.
  • Cost-Effective
    SQS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you only pay for the number of calls made to the API and the amount of data transferred, making it a cost-effective solution for many use cases.
  • Security
    SQS integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to control access. Additionally, it supports encryption of messages in transit and at rest, enhancing security.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon SQS

  • Message Limitation
    Each SQS message can body can be up to 256 KB in size during one API call, which might be restrictive for certain applications that require larger message payloads.
  • Latency
    Though generally fast, there can be latency in message delivery, especially when compared to more direct communication methods like WebSocket or gRPC.
  • Complexity in Handling Large Number of Messages
    While SQS can handle a large number of messages, managing a very high throughput can become complex, requiring careful configuration of multiple queues, message batching, and appropriate back-off and retry logic.
  • Cost for High Volume
    While cost-effective for many scenarios, SQS costs can increase significantly with very high volumes of messages due to the per-request pricing, potentially necessitating budget management.
  • Limited Ordering Guarantees
    Standard queues do not ensure the order of message processing. While FIFO queues provide ordering, they come with limitations in terms of throughput and additional costs.
  • Visibility Timeout
    Incorrectly setting the visibility timeout can result in duplicated message processing or delayed message processing, requiring careful consideration and configuration based on the application's characteristics.

Apache Qpid videos

Building a scalable and highly available messaging system with the Apache Qpid Community

Amazon SQS videos

Speed and Reliability at Any Scale: Amazon SQS and Database Services (SVC206) | AWS re:Invent 2013

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Qpid and Amazon SQS)
Stream Processing
15 15%
85% 85
Data Integration
12 12%
88% 88
Web Service Automation
14 14%
86% 86
Communication
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Qpid and Amazon SQS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Qpid and Amazon SQS

Apache Qpid Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Qpid yet.
Be the first one to post

Amazon SQS Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Amazon SQS offers standard features such as dead-letter queues and costs allocation tags. With Amazon SQS, you can access the web services API in any programming language that supports the AWS SDK.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Amazon SQS (Simple Queue Service) is a fully managed, message queuing service for distributed systems, serverless applications, and microservices. It is known for the dissociation of components and the creation of effective asynchronous processes. It possesses a good SKD and a useful console. Because of its salient features, it is easy to use and hence favored by developers.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon SQS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 72 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Qpid mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Qpid yet. Tracking of Apache Qpid recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Amazon SQS mentions (72)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Qpid and Amazon SQS, you can also consider the following products

ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Amazon SNS - Fully managed pub/sub messaging for microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications

Amazon MQ - Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Easily migrate messaging.