Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Portable Runtime VS Hedvig

Compare Apache Portable Runtime VS Hedvig and see what are their differences

Apache Portable Runtime logo Apache Portable Runtime

The Apache Portable Runtime (APR) is a supporting library for the Apache web server.

Hedvig logo Hedvig

Insurance built on top of A.I for social good.
  • Apache Portable Runtime Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16
  • Hedvig Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16

Apache Portable Runtime features and specs

  • Portability
    APR provides a consistent API across various platforms, enabling developers to write applications that are portable between different operating systems.
  • Performance
    APR is designed to provide high-performance solutions for common programming tasks, such as file I/O, network communication, and memory management, optimized for each supported platform.
  • Rich API Set
    APR provides a comprehensive set of APIs for handling tasks like file operations, network sockets, shared memory, and threading, which can simplify application development.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source library, APR allows developers to inspect, modify, and distribute the source code, fostering community collaboration and trust.
  • Apache Integration
    APR is used by Apache HTTP Server and other Apache projects, offering proven stability and performance tested in enterprise environments.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Portable Runtime

  • Complexity
    The wide range of functionality and extensive API set can introduce complexity, making the learning curve steeper for new developers.
  • Limited Language Support
    APR is primarily designed for use with C and C++. Developers using other programming languages may find it less accessible or require additional bindings.
  • Platform Specific Issues
    Despite its goal of portability, certain platform-specific issues or limitations may arise, requiring additional effort to ensure consistent application behavior.
  • Dependency Overhead
    Using APR can introduce additional dependencies into a project, potentially complicating the build process and increasing the size of the deployed application.
  • Not Always Necessary
    For applications that do not require cross-platform compatibility or for environments where minimal external dependencies are preferred, the use of APR might not be justified.

Hedvig features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Hedvig offers a modern and intuitive user interface which makes it easy for customers to navigate and manage their insurance policies.
  • Digital-First Approach
    Hedvig operates primarily through an app and online platform, catering to the needs of digitally-savvy users who prefer managing their insurance on-the-go.
  • Customer Support
    Hedvig is known for its responsive and helpful customer support team, providing assistance through chat and simplifying the claims process.
  • Pay-What-You-Use Model
    Hedvig's pricing model allows customers to pay based on their actual use, ensuring that customers only pay for what they need.
  • Tailored Insurance Options
    Hedvig offers a variety of customizable insurance options, allowing users to tailor their coverage to their specific needs and circumstances.

Possible disadvantages of Hedvig

  • Limited Availability
    Hedvig is currently available in select markets, which may exclude potential customers outside those regions who are interested in their services.
  • Dependence on Technology
    As a digital-first company, Hedvig's services are heavily reliant on technology, which could be a disadvantage for customers who prefer traditional methods of managing insurance.
  • Potential for Higher Costs
    While the pay-what-you-use model can be beneficial, there is potential for costs to be higher than expected if customers frequently use their coverage.
  • Limited Product Range
    Hedvig's focus on specific types of insurance might limit options for customers looking for a comprehensive suite of insurance products.
  • Newer Market Entrant
    As a relatively new player in the insurance market, Hedvig may lack the long-standing reputation and stability of more established companies.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Portable Runtime and Hedvig)
Cloud Storage
57 57%
43% 43
Cloud Computing
56 56%
44% 44
Storage
58 58%
42% 42
Object Storage
41 41%
59% 59

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Portable Runtime and Hedvig. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Portable Runtime seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Portable Runtime mentions (5)

  • Giving C++ std:regex a C makeover
    Something like that would probably end up similar to GLib or the Apache Portable Runtime. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/ https://apr.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • My review of the C standard library in practice
    There are many libraries available that you can use as a libc replacement instead of CCAN, if that’s what you prefer [1-3]. Taking on a beefy dependency like that can be overkill, though, if all you need is a linked list or dynamic array implementation. [1] http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/ [2] http://apr.apache.org/ [3] https://libcork.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Is there a custom "C Standard Library" out there?
    There are many. APR is one of them. APR stands for Apache Portable Runtime. It includes arrays(aprarray) and hash tables(aprhash), but not trees. Source: over 2 years ago
  • A C Standard Library
    A library that already implements some of this called libapr is what I’d consider a good example of libraries of this Ilk. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Git's list of banned C functions
    It's not really complacency: it's that the standard library is intentionally minimalistic to maintain portability and backwards compatibility. If you want sensible string handling, it's usually best to use a high level utility library like GLib(https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/) or Apache Portable Runtime(http://apr.apache.org/), or roll your own safe string type (preferably non-null terminating). - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

Hedvig mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Hedvig yet. Tracking of Hedvig recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Portable Runtime and Hedvig, you can also consider the following products

rkt - App Container runtime

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.

REX-Ray - Runtime

Apache Edgent - Apache Edgent is an open source community for accelerating analytics at the edge.