Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Portable Runtime VS Apache Edgent

Compare Apache Portable Runtime VS Apache Edgent and see what are their differences

Apache Portable Runtime logo Apache Portable Runtime

The Apache Portable Runtime (APR) is a supporting library for the Apache web server.

Apache Edgent logo Apache Edgent

Apache Edgent is an open source community for accelerating analytics at the edge.
  • Apache Portable Runtime Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16
  • Apache Edgent Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-08

Apache Portable Runtime features and specs

  • Portability
    APR provides a consistent API across various platforms, enabling developers to write applications that are portable between different operating systems.
  • Performance
    APR is designed to provide high-performance solutions for common programming tasks, such as file I/O, network communication, and memory management, optimized for each supported platform.
  • Rich API Set
    APR provides a comprehensive set of APIs for handling tasks like file operations, network sockets, shared memory, and threading, which can simplify application development.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source library, APR allows developers to inspect, modify, and distribute the source code, fostering community collaboration and trust.
  • Apache Integration
    APR is used by Apache HTTP Server and other Apache projects, offering proven stability and performance tested in enterprise environments.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Portable Runtime

  • Complexity
    The wide range of functionality and extensive API set can introduce complexity, making the learning curve steeper for new developers.
  • Limited Language Support
    APR is primarily designed for use with C and C++. Developers using other programming languages may find it less accessible or require additional bindings.
  • Platform Specific Issues
    Despite its goal of portability, certain platform-specific issues or limitations may arise, requiring additional effort to ensure consistent application behavior.
  • Dependency Overhead
    Using APR can introduce additional dependencies into a project, potentially complicating the build process and increasing the size of the deployed application.
  • Not Always Necessary
    For applications that do not require cross-platform compatibility or for environments where minimal external dependencies are preferred, the use of APR might not be justified.

Apache Edgent features and specs

  • Lightweight Architecture
    Apache Edgent is designed to run with a minimal footprint, making it suitable for edge devices with limited resources such as IoT sensors and gateways.
  • Real-time Processing
    It enables real-time data processing and streaming analytics at the edge, providing immediate insights and reducing latency by processing data close to the source.
  • Flexibility and Modularity
    Edgent's architecture is modular, allowing developers to easily integrate and customize functionalities to fit specific needs and applications.
  • Connectivity
    Provides strong support for connecting edge devices to central data systems, facilitating seamless data flow between devices and backend systems.
  • Open-source Community
    As an Apache project, it benefits from a strong community of developers and extensive documentation, enhancing support and continuous improvement.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Edgent

  • Limited Adoption
    Compared to other data streaming solutions, Apache Edgent has a smaller user base and community support, which may affect resources and third-party integrations.
  • Incubating Status
    Edgent is in the Apache Incubator, indicating that it's an evolving project which might not yet meet all expectations for stability and maturity in production environments.
  • Complex Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with stream processing or edge computing, the initial learning curve can be steep, requiring time to fully understand and utilize the API effectively.
  • Integration Challenges
    While modular, integrating Edgent with existing enterprise systems can sometimes present challenges, particularly for organizations with complex legacy infrastructure.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Portable Runtime and Apache Edgent)
Cloud Storage
46 46%
54% 54
Cloud Computing
47 47%
53% 53
Storage
45 45%
55% 55
Object Storage
38 38%
62% 62

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Portable Runtime and Apache Edgent. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Portable Runtime seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Portable Runtime mentions (5)

  • Giving C++ std:regex a C makeover
    Something like that would probably end up similar to GLib or the Apache Portable Runtime. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/ https://apr.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • My review of the C standard library in practice
    There are many libraries available that you can use as a libc replacement instead of CCAN, if that’s what you prefer [1-3]. Taking on a beefy dependency like that can be overkill, though, if all you need is a linked list or dynamic array implementation. [1] http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/ [2] http://apr.apache.org/ [3] https://libcork.io/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Is there a custom "C Standard Library" out there?
    There are many. APR is one of them. APR stands for Apache Portable Runtime. It includes arrays(aprarray) and hash tables(aprhash), but not trees. Source: over 2 years ago
  • A C Standard Library
    A library that already implements some of this called libapr is what I’d consider a good example of libraries of this Ilk. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Git's list of banned C functions
    It's not really complacency: it's that the standard library is intentionally minimalistic to maintain portability and backwards compatibility. If you want sensible string handling, it's usually best to use a high level utility library like GLib(https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/) or Apache Portable Runtime(http://apr.apache.org/), or roll your own safe string type (preferably non-null terminating). - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

Apache Edgent mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Edgent yet. Tracking of Apache Edgent recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Portable Runtime and Apache Edgent, you can also consider the following products

rkt - App Container runtime

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.

REX-Ray - Runtime

Sheepdog - Sheepdog is a distributed object storage system for volume and container services and manages the...