Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache OpenWhisk VS codepad

Compare Apache OpenWhisk VS codepad and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache OpenWhisk logo Apache OpenWhisk

Serverless / Task Processing

codepad logo codepad

Very simple webpage with a simple textbox, a checkbox for selecting one of several languages and an...
  • Apache OpenWhisk Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-18
  • codepad Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

Apache OpenWhisk features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

codepad features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codepad features a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to quickly test and share code snippets without any setup.
  • Language Support
    Codepad supports multiple programming languages including C, C++, D, Haskell, Lua, OCaml, PHP, Perl, Python, Ruby, Scheme, and Tcl.
  • URL Sharing
    Users can share their code snippets easily with a unique URL, making it convenient for collaboration and code reviews.
  • Instant Execution
    Codepad allows for real-time execution of code, enabling immediate feedback on code performance and correctness.
  • No Account Required
    Users do not need to create an account to use Codepad. They can paste their code and get results instantly.

Possible disadvantages of codepad

  • Limited Features
    Codepad lacks advanced features like debugging tools, syntax highlighting, or integrated development environments (IDE), which might be essential for more complex programming tasks.
  • Privacy Concerns
    All code snippets shared on Codepad are public, which poses privacy concerns for users sharing sensitive or proprietary code.
  • No Version Control
    Codepad does not support version control, which makes tracking changes and collaborating on code more difficult.
  • Limited Language Support
    While Codepad supports several popular programming languages, it may not support newer or less common languages.
  • Performance Limitations
    The platform might struggle with larger code snippets or more complex computations due to its simplicity and lack of optimization features.

Analysis of codepad

Overall verdict

  • Codepad is a useful tool for quick, temporary code sharing and testing. However, it is not ideal for full-fledged development or handling complex projects due to its basic features and limitations in terms of debugging support and version control.

Why this product is good

  • Codepad.org is a simple online compiler and interpreter for multiple programming languages. It is particularly useful for sharing code snippets quickly without needing to set up an environment locally. It allows users to execute code snippets and share the results via a URL, which can be convenient for collaboration, especially in educational settings or online forums.

Recommended for

  • Students learning programming who need a quick way to test snippets.
  • Developers sharing small code examples with peers.
  • Collaborators who need an easy way to showcase code behavior.

Apache OpenWhisk videos

+ Add

A Tour of the New Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Project and Its Numerous Repositories - Matt Rutkowski

More videos:

  • Review - 2018-05-23 Apache OpenWhisk Tech Interchange - Web Meeting
  • Review - 2018-06-20 Apache OpenWhisk Tech Interchange - Zoom Meeting

codepad videos

+ Add

Codepad - Video Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache OpenWhisk and codepad)

Apache OpenWhisk

codepad

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Developer Tools
29 29%
Developer Tools
71% 71
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
Design Playground
0 0%
Design Playground
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache OpenWhisk and codepad. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache OpenWhisk should be more popular than codepad. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache OpenWhisk mentions (7)

  • The 2024 Web Hosting Report
    Serverless functions are now offered by many cloud providers, as well as having options like OpenFaaS, Knative, Apache's Openwhisk and more from the open source community that run in environments ranging from one server all the way up to globally replicated private clusters. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • My first serverless function on DigitalOcean
    The serverless functions with Digital Ocean are based on Apache Open Whisk, so the service has additional name space, which need to go into the URL. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • run a RestAPI on Every container?
    The two biggest options are OpenWhisk and OpenFaas. Check out /r/serverless for more options. I'm experimenting currently with OpenFaas as it's the lighter weigh to of the two. Source: over 2 years ago
  • which is best open source alternative to lamda
    If you meant lambda for cloud functions provided by Amazon then this is open source and free, as long as you host it yourself: https://openwhisk.apache.org/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Orchestrator self hosted
    Not necessarily an orchestrator, but you could take a look at https://openwhisk.apache.org/ it's like AWS Lambdas but for kubernetes (and open shift if you swing that way). Haven't used it personally, but the reading I've done on it suggests you could probably use it for this. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

codepad mentions (2)

  • How make my 2nd photo overlap background
    Share your code with http://pastebin.com/ or http://codepad.org/ (or by pasting it here and following the formatting advice in the sidebar). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Python 3 Online Interpreter / Shell [closed]
    As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 9 years ago.Is there an online interpreter like http://codepad.org/... Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache OpenWhisk and codepad, you can also consider the following products

Dkron - Easy, Reliable Cron jobs A distributed Cron service with, API, no SPOF and an easy to use dashboard.

Pastebin.com - Pastebin.com is a website where you can store text for a certain period of time.

Lambada Framework - Build serverless REST API's with JAVA. It implements the JAX-RS API and deploys your application easily to AWS Lambda and API Gateway - cagataygurturk/lambadaframework

myCompiler - Run your favourite programming languages online

Knative - Knative provides a set of components for building modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere.

Browxy - Browxy is a web application that serves as an integrated development environment where you can write in coding languages, compile them or edit them.

Loading...