Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Maven VS Ninja Build

Compare Apache Maven VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

Apache Maven logo Apache Maven

Apache Maven is a project comprehension and management software tool.

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
  • Apache Maven Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14

Apache Maven features and specs

  • Dependency Management
    Maven simplifies the process of including third-party libraries in your project. It automatically downloads the libraries your project depends on and also their dependencies transitively.
  • Standardized Project Structure
    Maven enforces a standard project structure. This makes it easier for developers to understand and navigate newly joined projects.
  • Reproducible Builds
    With Maven, builds are more consistent and reproducible across different environments, thanks to its strict configuration and dependency management.
  • Extensive Plugin Ecosystem
    Maven has a rich ecosystem of plugins for tasks like compiling code, packaging software, running tests, and generating documentation, which can be easily integrated into the build process.
  • Multi-Module Projects
    Maven supports multi-module projects, allowing for better organization and separation of concerns within large projects that might consist of multiple interdependent subprojects.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Maven

  • XML Configuration
    Maven uses XML for its configuration, which can become verbose and cumbersome, especially for complex projects with numerous dependencies and plugins.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may find Maven's concepts and configurations challenging to learn and understand, particularly the dependency management and lifecycle phases.
  • Performance Issues
    The build process in Maven can sometimes be slow, particularly for large projects with extensive dependencies, as it needs to download and check for updates in the repository.
  • Lack of Flexibility
    Maven's conventions and structures might be overly rigid for some projects. Custom build requirements may sometimes require awkward workarounds or even external tools.
  • Potential for Dependency Conflicts
    While Maven manages dependencies well, complex projects can still encounter issues with conflicting versions of transitive dependencies, leading to build errors and runtime issues.

Ninja Build features and specs

  • Speed
    Ninja is designed for high performance, making it one of the fastest build systems available. It minimizes the time spent on tasks such as parsing, dependency resolution, and build command execution.
  • Simplicity
    Ninja’s configuration syntax is straightforward and concise, reducing the complexity involved in setting up builds and allowing for a clear overview of build rules.
  • Parallelism
    Ninja excels at handling parallel builds, leveraging multiple cores effectively to decrease overall build times.
  • Incremental Builds
    Ninja efficiently handles incremental builds by only recompiling what is necessary, which significantly speeds up iterative development processes.
  • Integration
    Ninja is often used as the backend for more complex build systems (e.g., CMake), making it a versatile tool within a larger toolchain.

Possible disadvantages of Ninja Build

  • Limited Features
    Ninja is deliberately minimalist, lacking many of the features found in other build systems, such as built-in support for complex dependency management and custom build steps.
  • Learning Curve
    While Ninja itself has a simple syntax, the learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with how build systems work or for those coming from more feature-rich environments.
  • Dependency on Generators
    Ninja often requires an external generator (like CMake) to create its build files, which can add to the setup complexity and introduce dependencies on other tools.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    Unlike some build systems that offer extensive scripting support (e.g., Python in SCons), Ninja's functionality is largely limited to what its syntax and predefined rules allow.
  • Less Flexibility
    Due to its minimalist nature, Ninja may not be as flexible as other build systems, potentially limiting its use in more complex or unusual build scenarios.

Apache Maven videos

Apache Maven - Review of Concepts & Theory!

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Maven - Introduction || Automation || Episode 01

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Maven and Ninja Build)
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
Continuous Integration
100 100%
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Maven and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Maven and Ninja Build

Apache Maven Reviews

35+ Of The Best CI/CD Tools: Organized By Category
Apache Maven is a software build automation and project management tool. It’s popular among the open-source and Java community. Maven allows you to build and deploy code in Scala, Ruby, Java, C#, Python, etc.

Ninja Build Reviews

We have no reviews of Ninja Build yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Maven should be more popular than Ninja Build. It has been mentiond 56 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Maven mentions (56)

  • Testing the startup time for your Fire OS app
    Install Maven Hint: The instructions on Maven’s website can be a bit confounding, so: If you’re on a Mac, use Homebrew to install it by running brew install maven in the terminal If you’re on Windows, check out this blog post. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Tutorial: Build a Java SDK based on OpenAPI Spec
    Maven: If you're more familiar with Maven and don't need custom build logic, it’s a Solid, well-established Option. Maven is known for its simplicity, strong dependency management, and extensive ecosystem. It integrates easily With package distribution platforms like Maven Central. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • My Journey with AWS CDK and Java: What You Need to Know
    From what I’ve seen, adopting the CDK in Java is relatively easy for most of these teams as they already understand the language and the ecosystem. Integrating the CDK with their existing build tools like Maven and Gradle is well documented, which leaves them with the learning curve of understanding how to work with infrastructure as code, how to structure a CDK project and when to use L1, L2 and L3 constructs. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Install Apache Maven
    Visit the official Maven website to download the latest version of Maven. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • How to secure Python Flask applications
    In addition, Snyk can be easily integrated with various IDEs, including Visual Studio Code and PyCharm, as well as CI pipelines, such as Jenkins, CircleCI, and Maven, and workflows. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
View more

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Maven and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...