CircleCI VS Ninja Build
Compare CircleCI VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences
Preferred Patron is the top Customer Loyalty Software Program for businesses in any industry of any size.
featured
CircleCI
Jenkins
Codeship
Travis CI
Bitrise
Bamboo
Buddy
Semaphore
Ninja Build
GNU Make
SCons
Meson
CMake
Apache Maven
Buck
npm
CircleCI Ninja BuildBased on our record, CircleCI should be more popular than Ninja Build. It has been mentiond 61 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
CircleCI is a leading cloud-native CI/CD platform that empowers developers to rapidly build, test, and deploy their applications at scale. It is highly configurable and has rich integrations and performance optimization tools. These features have made it a favorite among modern development teams seeking agility and speed. - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago
For instance, IDPs can automatically trigger a deployment process in Jenkins or CircleCI when a developer pushes code to a Git repository. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
CircleCI — Comprehensive free plan with all features included in a hosted CI/CD service for GitHub, GitLab, and BitBucket repositories. Multiple resource classes, Docker, Windows, Mac OS, ARM executors, local runners, test splitting, Docker Layer Caching, and other advanced CI/CD features. Free for up to 6000 minutes/month execution time, unlimited collaborators, 30 parallel jobs in private projects, and up to... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
CircleCI: Another popular CI/CD platform that offers powerful features and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Preevy is designed to be easily run in CI/CD workflows, such as GH Actions, Circle CI and others. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 10 months ago
Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development
GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.
Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.
Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...