Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache Karaf VS DepHell

Compare Apache Karaf VS DepHell and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache Karaf logo Apache Karaf

Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

DepHell logo DepHell

:package: :fire: Python project management. Manage packages: convert between formats, lock, install, resolve, isolate, test, build graph, show outdated, audit. Manage venvs, build package, bump ver...
  • Apache Karaf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-29
  • DepHell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-28

Apache Karaf features and specs

  • Modular architecture
    Apache Karaf features a highly modular architecture that allows users to deploy, control, and monitor applications in a flexible and efficient manner. This makes it easy to manage dependencies and extend functionalities as needed.
  • OSGi support
    Karaf fully supports OSGi (Open Services Gateway initiative), which is a framework for developing and deploying modular software programs and libraries. This enables dynamic updates and replacement of modules without requiring a system restart.
  • Extensible and flexible
    Karaf's extensible architecture allows developers to integrate various technologies and custom modules, fostering a flexible environment that can suit a wide range of application types and requirements.
  • Enterprise features
    It provides a range of enterprise-ready features such as hot deployment, dynamic configuration, clustering, and high availability, which can help in building robust and scalable applications.
  • Comprehensive tooling
    Karaf comes with comprehensive tooling support including a powerful CLI, web console, and various tools for monitoring and managing the runtime environment. These tools simplify everyday management tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Karaf

  • Steeper learning curve
    Due to its modular and extensible nature, Apache Karaf can have a steeper learning curve for new users, especially those unfamiliar with OSGi concepts and enterprise middleware.
  • Resource intensity
    Running and managing an Apache Karaf instance can be resource-intensive, especially when dealing with large-scale or highly modular applications. Adequate memory and processing power are required to maintain optimal performance.
  • Complex deployment
    While Karaf can handle complex deployment scenarios, setting it up and configuring it properly can be more involved compared to other simpler solutions. This complexity can increase the initial setup time and effort.
  • Limited community support
    Despite being an Apache project, the community around Apache Karaf might not be as large or active as other popular frameworks, potentially making it harder to find ample resources or immediate support.
  • Dependency management challenges
    Managing dependencies in Karaf, especially when dealing with multiple third-party libraries and their versions, can become cumbersome and lead to conflicts if not handled carefully.

DepHell features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Apache Karaf videos

+ Add

EIK - How to use Apache Karaf inside of Eclipse

More videos:

  • Review - OpenDaylight's Apache Karaf Report- Jamie Goodyear

DepHell videos

No DepHell videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Karaf and DepHell)

Apache Karaf

DepHell

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
Workflow Automation
0 0%
Workflow Automation
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Karaf and DepHell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, DepHell should be more popular than Apache Karaf. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Karaf mentions (1)

  • Need advice: Java Software Architecture for SaaS startup doing CRUD and REST APIs?
    Apache Karaf with OSGi works pretty nice using annotation based dependency injection with the declarative services, removing the need to mess with those hopefully archaic XML blueprints. Too bad it's not as trendy as spring and the developers so many of the tutorials can be a bit dated and hard to find. Karaf also supports many other frameworks and programming models as well and there's even Red Hat supported... Source: about 4 years ago

DepHell mentions (4)

  • How to generate setup.py from pyproject.toml
    I've found https://github.com/dephell/dephell but seems to be outdated. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Should i Continue this Project or Abandon it? ; https://github.com/iamDyeus/KnickAI
    I had a few relatively famous projects (like dephell), and at some point I lost my sleep because I was "fixing bugs" in it in my head in the middle of the night. Archiving it, closing issues in everything else, and starting to just write projects for my own fun only was the best decision I ever made. Don't make my mistakes. Don't ask random people on the internet what you should do. Do what you want to do and... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • PDM: A Modern Python Package Manager
    You jest and yet... https://github.com/dephell/dephell Dephell is a converter for python packaging systems. It can turn poetry files into requirements.txt, or setuptools' setup.py into pipenv's Pipfile etc. Python Packaging: There is More Than One Way to Do It. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • [D] What’s the simplest, most lightweight but complete and 100% open source MLOps toolkit? -> MY OWN CONCLUSIONS
    Not necessarily. You can use Dephell (https://github.com/dephell/dephell) to convert from poetry to the old-fashioned requirements.txt. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Karaf and DepHell, you can also consider the following products

Docker - Docker is an open platform that enables developers and system administrators to create distributed applications.

Metaflow - Framework for real-life data science; build, improve, and operate end-to-end workflows.

Google App Engine - A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.

Activeeon - ProActive Workflows & Scheduling is a java-based cross-platform workflow scheduler and resource manager that is able to run workflow tasks in multiple languages and multiple environments: Windows, Linux, Mac, Unix, etc.

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

Azkaban - Azkaban is a batch workflow job scheduler created at LinkedIn to run Hadoop jobs.

Loading...