Software Alternatives & Reviews

Apache Ignite VS Tile38

Compare Apache Ignite VS Tile38 and see what are their differences

Apache Ignite logo Apache Ignite

high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...

Tile38 logo Tile38

Geospatial database and real-time geofence server for managing fleets, mobile apps, and IoT devices.
  • Apache Ignite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-08
  • Tile38 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-26

Apache Ignite videos

Best Practices for a Microservices Architecture on Apache Ignite

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Ignite + GridGain powering up banks and financial institutions with distributed systems

Tile38 videos

GopherCon 2018 Lightning Talk: Josh Baker - Roaming Geofences with Tile38

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Ignite and Tile38)
Databases
80 80%
20% 20
NoSQL Databases
80 80%
20% 20
Key-Value Database
76 76%
24% 24
Relational Databases
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Ignite and Tile38. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Ignite should be more popular than Tile38. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Ignite mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: P2P Databases?
    Ignite works as you describe: https://ignite.apache.org/ I wouldn't really recommend this approach, I would think more in terms of subscriptions and topics and less of a 'database'. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • .NET and Apache Ignite: Testing Cache and SQL API features — Part I
    Last days, I started using Apache Ignite as a cache strategy for some applications. Apache Ignite is an open-source In-Memory Data Grid, distributed database, caching, and high-performance computing platform. Source: over 2 years ago

Tile38 mentions (1)

  • Your Data Fits in RAM
    I actually worked on a project that did this. We used a database called "Tile38" [1] which used an R-Tree to make geospatial queries speedy. It was pretty good. Our dataset was ~150 GiB, I think? All in RAM. Took a while to start the server, as it all came off disk. Could have been faster. (It borrowed Redis's query language, and its storage was just "store the commands the recreate the DB, literally", IIRC. Dead... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Ignite and Tile38, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

VoltDB - In-memory relational DBMS capable of supporting millions of database operations per second

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

Aerospike - Aerospike is a high-performing NoSQL database supporting high transaction volumes with low latency.

Hazelcast - Clustering and highly scalable data distribution platform for Java