Software Alternatives & Reviews

Tile38 VS Hazelcast

Compare Tile38 VS Hazelcast and see what are their differences

Tile38 logo Tile38

Geospatial database and real-time geofence server for managing fleets, mobile apps, and IoT devices.

Hazelcast logo Hazelcast

Clustering and highly scalable data distribution platform for Java
  • Tile38 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-26
  • Hazelcast Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-05

Tile38 videos

GopherCon 2018 Lightning Talk: Josh Baker - Roaming Geofences with Tile38

Hazelcast videos

Hazelcast Introduction and cluster demo

More videos:

  • Review - Comparing and Benchmarking Data Grids Apache Ignite vs Hazelcast
  • Demo - Hazelcast Cloud Enterprise - Getting Started Demo Video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Tile38 and Hazelcast)
Databases
24 24%
76% 76
NoSQL Databases
22 22%
78% 78
Key-Value Database
26 26%
74% 74
Search API
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Tile38 and Hazelcast. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Tile38 and Hazelcast

Tile38 Reviews

We have no reviews of Tile38 yet.
Be the first one to post

Hazelcast Reviews

HazelCast - Redis Replacement
Hazelcast IMDG provides a Discovery Service Provider Interface (SPI), which allows users to implement custom member discovery mechanisms to deploy Hazelcast IMDG on any platform. Hazelcast® Discovery SPI also allows you to use third-party software like Zookeeper, Eureka, Consul, etcd for implementing custom discovery mechanism.
Source: hazelcast.org

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Tile38 seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Tile38 mentions (1)

  • Your Data Fits in RAM
    I actually worked on a project that did this. We used a database called "Tile38" [1] which used an R-Tree to make geospatial queries speedy. It was pretty good. Our dataset was ~150 GiB, I think? All in RAM. Took a while to start the server, as it all came off disk. Could have been faster. (It borrowed Redis's query language, and its storage was just "store the commands the recreate the DB, literally", IIRC. Dead... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Hazelcast mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Hazelcast yet. Tracking of Hazelcast recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Tile38 and Hazelcast, you can also consider the following products

VoltDB - In-memory relational DBMS capable of supporting millions of database operations per second

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

Aerospike - Aerospike is a high-performing NoSQL database supporting high transaction volumes with low latency.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Beringei - High performance, in-memory storage engine for time series data (by Facebook)