Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache Ignite VS Squid Proxy

Compare Apache Ignite VS Squid Proxy and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache Ignite logo Apache Ignite

high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...

Squid Proxy logo Squid Proxy

Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.
  • Apache Ignite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-08
  • Squid Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

Apache Ignite features and specs

  • In-Memory Data Grid
    Apache Ignite provides a robust in-memory data grid that can drastically improve data access speeds by storing data in memory across distributed nodes.
  • Scalability
    The system is designed to scale horizontally, allowing users to add more nodes to handle increased loads, thereby ensuring high availability and performance.
  • Distributed Compute Capabilities
    Ignite supports parallel execution of tasks across cluster nodes, which is beneficial for complex computations and real-time processing.
  • Persistence
    Although primarily in-memory, Ignite offers a durable and transactional Persistence layer that ensures data can be persisted on disk, providing a hybrid in-memory and persistent storage solution.
  • SQL Queries
    Ignite offers support for ANSI-99 SQL, which allows users to execute complex SQL queries across distributed datasets easily.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with existing Hadoop and Spark setups, allowing users to enhance their existing data pipelines with Ignite’s capabilities.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Apache Ignite includes built-in mechanisms for recovery and ensures that data copies are maintained across nodes for resilience against node failures.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Ignite

  • Complexity
    Apache Ignite can be complex to set up and manage, especially when configuring a large, distributed system with multiple nodes.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running an in-memory data grid like Ignite requires significant memory resources, which can increase operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and distributed nature, there is a steep learning curve associated with effectively utilizing Ignite.
  • Configuration Overhead
    There is substantial configuration overhead involved to optimize performance and ensure proper cluster management.
  • Community Support
    Although it has active development, the community support might not be as robust compared to other more mature solutions, possibly leading to challenges in finding solutions to niche issues.
  • YARN Dependence
    For those looking to integrate with Hadoop, Ignite's optimal performance is sometimes reliant on Hadoop YARN, which can introduce additional complexity.

Squid Proxy features and specs

  • Caching
    Squid Proxy supports caching, which can reduce bandwidth usage and improve access speeds by storing frequently accessed resources locally.
  • Access Control
    Squid Proxy provides detailed access control features, allowing administrators to manage who can access certain resources and when they can do so.
  • Content Filtering
    With Squid Proxy, it is possible to block access to specific websites or content types, making it useful for environments where content control is necessary.
  • SSL Support
    Squid Proxy supports HTTPS decryption and encryption, which allows it to handle secure content delivery efficiently.
  • Load Balancing
    Squid Proxy can distribute the load among multiple servers, improving reliability and performance.
  • Customizable
    Squid Proxy is highly configurable with a wide range of options and settings, making it flexible to meet specific needs.
  • Open Source
    Squid Proxy is open-source software, meaning it is freely available and can be modified to fit specific requirements without licensing costs.

Possible disadvantages of Squid Proxy

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring Squid Proxy can be complicated, requiring a good understanding of networking and proxy concepts.
  • Performance Overhead
    Because of its extensive feature set, Squid Proxy can introduce additional latency compared to a simpler proxy solution.
  • Resource Intensive
    Squid Proxy can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory, especially for large-scale deployments.
  • Maintenance
    Regular updates and maintenance are necessary to keep Squid Proxy secure and running efficiently, which can be time-consuming.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its complexity, new users may face a steep learning curve when first getting started with Squid Proxy.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There can be compatibility issues with certain web protocols and applications, requiring additional configuration or workarounds.

Analysis of Squid Proxy

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Squid Proxy is considered a good option for organizations looking to optimize web delivery and improve network efficiency. Its open-source nature and community support make it a reliable choice for various applications.

Why this product is good

  • Squid Proxy, available at squid-cache.org, is a widely used caching proxy server that can improve network performance by caching and reusing frequently requested web pages. It is favored for its robust performance, scalability, and flexibility, supporting a wide range of caching protocols and being highly configurable to suit different network environments. Additionally, Squid can enhance security by filtering traffic and blocking access to certain websites.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with high web traffic volumes
  • ISPs looking to reduce bandwidth costs
  • Administrators focusing on web security and content filtering
  • Schools and libraries implementing internet access policies

Apache Ignite videos

+ Add

Best Practices for a Microservices Architecture on Apache Ignite

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Ignite + GridGain powering up banks and financial institutions with distributed systems

Squid Proxy videos

+ Add

Squid proxy server||proxy server||block unauthorized websites||Open Source||linux

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Ignite and Squid Proxy)

Apache Ignite

Squid Proxy

Databases
100 100%
Databases
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
Proxy
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
NoSQL Databases
0% 0
Proxy Server
0 0%
Proxy Server
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Ignite and Squid Proxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Ignite seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Ignite mentions (3)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Ignite — Free and open-source, Apache Ignite is a horizontally scalable key-value cache store system with a robust multi-model database that powers APIs to compute distributed data. Ignite provides a security system that can authenticate users' credentials on the server. It can also be used for system workload acceleration, real-time data processing, analytics, and as a graph-centric programming model. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Ask HN: P2P Databases?
    Ignite works as you describe: https://ignite.apache.org/ I wouldn't really recommend this approach, I would think more in terms of subscriptions and topics and less of a 'database'. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • .NET and Apache Ignite: Testing Cache and SQL API features — Part I
    Last days, I started using Apache Ignite as a cache strategy for some applications. Apache Ignite is an open-source In-Memory Data Grid, distributed database, caching, and high-performance computing platform. Source: almost 4 years ago

Squid Proxy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Squid Proxy yet. Tracking of Squid Proxy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Ignite and Squid Proxy, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

GonzoProxy - Premium proxies from $2/GB. Over 20M IPs across 150+ countries. No KYC, traffic never expires. 24/7 Telegram support.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

SX.ORG - SX.ORG - a fresh proxy market of 12M clean IP-addresses. All types and 200+ GEO for any tasks. Buy/sell proxies with us. Pay as you go system. Stable connection to manage multiple accounts. Get 3GB for FREE by promo code SAASHUB3GB

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

ABC S5 Proxy - ABCProxy is the top residential ip proxy service provider, with more than 200 million IP addresses covering more than 190 countries, providing elite anonymity, high connection rate IP, etc.

Loading...